Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels

Yuxia Duan, Hai Zhang, Xavier P.V. Maldague, Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo, Pierre Servais, Marc Genest, Stefano Sfarra, Jianqiao Meng

Результат исследований: Материалы для журналаСтатья

7 Цитирования (Scopus)

Аннотация

In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.

Язык оригиналаАнглийский
Страницы (с-по)77-83
Число страниц7
ЖурналNDT and E International
Том102
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 1 мар 2019

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanical Engineering

Цитировать

Duan, Y., Zhang, H., Maldague, X. P. V., Ibarra-Castanedo, C., Servais, P., Genest, M., Sfarra, S., & Meng, J. (2019). Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels. NDT and E International, 102, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010