Methods for land use impact assessment: A review

Tataina Perminova, Bertrand Laratte, Natalia Sirina, Natalia Vladimirovna Baranovskaya, Leonid Rikhvanov

Результат исследований: Материалы для журналаОбзорная статья

15 Цитирования (Scopus)

Выдержка

Many types of methods to assess land use impact have been developed. Nevertheless a systematic synthesis of all these approaches is necessary to highlight the most commonly used and most effective methods. Given the growing interest in this area of research, a review of the different methods of assessing land use impact (LUI) was performed using bibliometric analysis. One hundred eighty seven articles of agricultural and biological science, and environmental sciences were examined. According to our results, the most frequently used land use assessment methods are Life-Cycle Assessment, Material Flow Analysis/Input-Output Analysis, Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Footprint. Comparison of the methods allowed their specific features to be identified and to arrive at the conclusion that a combination of several methods is the best basis for a comprehensive analysis of land use impact assessment.

Язык оригиналаАнглийский
Страницы (с-по)64-74
Число страниц11
ЖурналEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Том60
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 1 сен 2016

Отпечаток

land use
material flow analysis
input-output analysis
ecological footprint
environmental impact assessment
assessment method
life cycle assessment
science
life cycle
impact assessment
method
environmental impact
analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Цитировать

Methods for land use impact assessment : A review. / Perminova, Tataina; Laratte, Bertrand; Sirina, Natalia; Baranovskaya, Natalia Vladimirovna; Rikhvanov, Leonid.

В: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Том 60, 01.09.2016, стр. 64-74.

Результат исследований: Материалы для журналаОбзорная статья

Perminova, Tataina ; Laratte, Bertrand ; Sirina, Natalia ; Baranovskaya, Natalia Vladimirovna ; Rikhvanov, Leonid. / Methods for land use impact assessment : A review. В: Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2016 ; Том 60. стр. 64-74.
@article{48b43b76770e4f05b0449669a17fc1a7,
title = "Methods for land use impact assessment: A review",
abstract = "Many types of methods to assess land use impact have been developed. Nevertheless a systematic synthesis of all these approaches is necessary to highlight the most commonly used and most effective methods. Given the growing interest in this area of research, a review of the different methods of assessing land use impact (LUI) was performed using bibliometric analysis. One hundred eighty seven articles of agricultural and biological science, and environmental sciences were examined. According to our results, the most frequently used land use assessment methods are Life-Cycle Assessment, Material Flow Analysis/Input-Output Analysis, Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Footprint. Comparison of the methods allowed their specific features to be identified and to arrive at the conclusion that a combination of several methods is the best basis for a comprehensive analysis of land use impact assessment.",
keywords = "Assessment methods, Bibliometric analysis, Environmental impact, Land use",
author = "Tataina Perminova and Bertrand Laratte and Natalia Sirina and Baranovskaya, {Natalia Vladimirovna} and Leonid Rikhvanov",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "64--74",
journal = "Environmental Impact Assessment Review",
issn = "0195-9255",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods for land use impact assessment

T2 - A review

AU - Perminova, Tataina

AU - Laratte, Bertrand

AU - Sirina, Natalia

AU - Baranovskaya, Natalia Vladimirovna

AU - Rikhvanov, Leonid

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Many types of methods to assess land use impact have been developed. Nevertheless a systematic synthesis of all these approaches is necessary to highlight the most commonly used and most effective methods. Given the growing interest in this area of research, a review of the different methods of assessing land use impact (LUI) was performed using bibliometric analysis. One hundred eighty seven articles of agricultural and biological science, and environmental sciences were examined. According to our results, the most frequently used land use assessment methods are Life-Cycle Assessment, Material Flow Analysis/Input-Output Analysis, Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Footprint. Comparison of the methods allowed their specific features to be identified and to arrive at the conclusion that a combination of several methods is the best basis for a comprehensive analysis of land use impact assessment.

AB - Many types of methods to assess land use impact have been developed. Nevertheless a systematic synthesis of all these approaches is necessary to highlight the most commonly used and most effective methods. Given the growing interest in this area of research, a review of the different methods of assessing land use impact (LUI) was performed using bibliometric analysis. One hundred eighty seven articles of agricultural and biological science, and environmental sciences were examined. According to our results, the most frequently used land use assessment methods are Life-Cycle Assessment, Material Flow Analysis/Input-Output Analysis, Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Footprint. Comparison of the methods allowed their specific features to be identified and to arrive at the conclusion that a combination of several methods is the best basis for a comprehensive analysis of land use impact assessment.

KW - Assessment methods

KW - Bibliometric analysis

KW - Environmental impact

KW - Land use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973171171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973171171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.002

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84973171171

VL - 60

SP - 64

EP - 74

JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

SN - 0195-9255

ER -