Abstract
Two dimensional FE simulations (2D) are less time-consuming and less expensive than three dimensional simulations (3D) but they generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of complex materials adequately. The assumptions of plane strain or plane stress conditions are simplifications, which can lead to unrealistic results. Three dimensional (3D) calculations require a larger number of finite elements for accurate reproduction of the real/complex microstructure. This microstructural information must be available from extensive experiments like computer tomography or serial sections. In this situation, the dimensions of the model measured in terms of microstructural length scale (e.g. inclusion size), especially its thickness is an important point. The thickness of the model should be big enough to get correct results, but a too big thickness enlarges the model unnecessarily. This paper gives a guideline, how to define the minimal dimension of the 3D-model of a particulate reinforced metal matrix composite, which provides correct results concerning local strains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | AES-ATEMA International Conference Series - Advances and Trends in Engineering Materials and their Applications |
| Pages | 429-435 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 1st International Conference on Advances and Trends in Engineering Materials and their Applications, AES-ATEMA'2007 - Montreal, QC, Canada Duration: 6 Aug 2007 → 10 Aug 2007 |
Other
| Other | 1st International Conference on Advances and Trends in Engineering Materials and their Applications, AES-ATEMA'2007 |
|---|---|
| Country | Canada |
| City | Montreal, QC |
| Period | 6.8.07 → 10.8.07 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- 3D simulations
- Finite element method (FEM)
- Metal matrix composites
- Microstructure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Mechanics of Materials
- Materials Science(all)
Cite this
Three-dimensional modeling of a two-phase material on the microscopic level. / Soppa, Ewa Anna; Romanova, Varvara.
AES-ATEMA International Conference Series - Advances and Trends in Engineering Materials and their Applications. 2007. p. 429-435.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Three-dimensional modeling of a two-phase material on the microscopic level
AU - Soppa, Ewa Anna
AU - Romanova, Varvara
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Two dimensional FE simulations (2D) are less time-consuming and less expensive than three dimensional simulations (3D) but they generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of complex materials adequately. The assumptions of plane strain or plane stress conditions are simplifications, which can lead to unrealistic results. Three dimensional (3D) calculations require a larger number of finite elements for accurate reproduction of the real/complex microstructure. This microstructural information must be available from extensive experiments like computer tomography or serial sections. In this situation, the dimensions of the model measured in terms of microstructural length scale (e.g. inclusion size), especially its thickness is an important point. The thickness of the model should be big enough to get correct results, but a too big thickness enlarges the model unnecessarily. This paper gives a guideline, how to define the minimal dimension of the 3D-model of a particulate reinforced metal matrix composite, which provides correct results concerning local strains.
AB - Two dimensional FE simulations (2D) are less time-consuming and less expensive than three dimensional simulations (3D) but they generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of complex materials adequately. The assumptions of plane strain or plane stress conditions are simplifications, which can lead to unrealistic results. Three dimensional (3D) calculations require a larger number of finite elements for accurate reproduction of the real/complex microstructure. This microstructural information must be available from extensive experiments like computer tomography or serial sections. In this situation, the dimensions of the model measured in terms of microstructural length scale (e.g. inclusion size), especially its thickness is an important point. The thickness of the model should be big enough to get correct results, but a too big thickness enlarges the model unnecessarily. This paper gives a guideline, how to define the minimal dimension of the 3D-model of a particulate reinforced metal matrix composite, which provides correct results concerning local strains.
KW - 3D simulations
KW - Finite element method (FEM)
KW - Metal matrix composites
KW - Microstructure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856624540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856624540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84856624540
SN - 0978047907
SN - 9780978047900
SP - 429
EP - 435
BT - AES-ATEMA International Conference Series - Advances and Trends in Engineering Materials and their Applications
ER -