The implications of time on the ground on running economy

Less is not always better

Thibault Lussiana, Aurélien Patoz, Cyrille Gindre, Laurent Mourot, Kim Hébert-Losier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A lower duty factor (DF) reflects a greater relative contribution of leg swing versus ground contact time during the running step. Increasing time on the ground has been reported in the scientific literature to both increase and decrease the energy cost (EC) of running, with DF reported to be highly variable in runners. As increasing running speed aligns running kinematics more closely with spring–mass model behaviours and re-use of elastic energy, we compared the centre of mass (COM) displacement and EC between runners with a low (DFlow) and high (DFhigh) duty factor at typical endurance running speeds. Forty well-trained runners were divided in two groups based on their mean DF measured across a range of speeds. EC was measured from 4 min treadmill runs at 10, 12 and 14 km h−1 using indirect calorimetry. Temporal characteristics and COM displacement data of the running step were recorded from 30 s treadmill runs at 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 km h−1. Across speeds, DFlow exhibited more symmetrical patterns between braking and propulsion phases in terms of time and vertical COM displacement than DFhigh. DFhigh limited global vertical COM displacements in favour of horizontal progression during ground contact. Despite these running kinematics differences, no significant difference in EC was observed between groups. Therefore, both DF strategies seem energetically efficient at endurance running speeds.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjeb192047
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume222
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

energy costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
exercise equipment
kinematics
Biomechanical Phenomena
energy
cost
Literature
Indirect Calorimetry
calorimetry
Leg
legs
economy
speed

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Energy cost
  • Running form
  • Self-optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Physiology
  • Aquatic Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Insect Science

Cite this

The implications of time on the ground on running economy : Less is not always better. / Lussiana, Thibault; Patoz, Aurélien; Gindre, Cyrille; Mourot, Laurent; Hébert-Losier, Kim.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 222, No. 6, jeb192047, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lussiana, Thibault ; Patoz, Aurélien ; Gindre, Cyrille ; Mourot, Laurent ; Hébert-Losier, Kim. / The implications of time on the ground on running economy : Less is not always better. In: Journal of Experimental Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 222, No. 6.
@article{0e5342f5075c456eb3734558ac1029af,
title = "The implications of time on the ground on running economy: Less is not always better",
abstract = "A lower duty factor (DF) reflects a greater relative contribution of leg swing versus ground contact time during the running step. Increasing time on the ground has been reported in the scientific literature to both increase and decrease the energy cost (EC) of running, with DF reported to be highly variable in runners. As increasing running speed aligns running kinematics more closely with spring–mass model behaviours and re-use of elastic energy, we compared the centre of mass (COM) displacement and EC between runners with a low (DFlow) and high (DFhigh) duty factor at typical endurance running speeds. Forty well-trained runners were divided in two groups based on their mean DF measured across a range of speeds. EC was measured from 4 min treadmill runs at 10, 12 and 14 km h−1 using indirect calorimetry. Temporal characteristics and COM displacement data of the running step were recorded from 30 s treadmill runs at 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 km h−1. Across speeds, DFlow exhibited more symmetrical patterns between braking and propulsion phases in terms of time and vertical COM displacement than DFhigh. DFhigh limited global vertical COM displacements in favour of horizontal progression during ground contact. Despite these running kinematics differences, no significant difference in EC was observed between groups. Therefore, both DF strategies seem energetically efficient at endurance running speeds.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Energy cost, Running form, Self-optimization",
author = "Thibault Lussiana and Aur{\'e}lien Patoz and Cyrille Gindre and Laurent Mourot and Kim H{\'e}bert-Losier",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.192047",
language = "English",
volume = "222",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The implications of time on the ground on running economy

T2 - Less is not always better

AU - Lussiana, Thibault

AU - Patoz, Aurélien

AU - Gindre, Cyrille

AU - Mourot, Laurent

AU - Hébert-Losier, Kim

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A lower duty factor (DF) reflects a greater relative contribution of leg swing versus ground contact time during the running step. Increasing time on the ground has been reported in the scientific literature to both increase and decrease the energy cost (EC) of running, with DF reported to be highly variable in runners. As increasing running speed aligns running kinematics more closely with spring–mass model behaviours and re-use of elastic energy, we compared the centre of mass (COM) displacement and EC between runners with a low (DFlow) and high (DFhigh) duty factor at typical endurance running speeds. Forty well-trained runners were divided in two groups based on their mean DF measured across a range of speeds. EC was measured from 4 min treadmill runs at 10, 12 and 14 km h−1 using indirect calorimetry. Temporal characteristics and COM displacement data of the running step were recorded from 30 s treadmill runs at 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 km h−1. Across speeds, DFlow exhibited more symmetrical patterns between braking and propulsion phases in terms of time and vertical COM displacement than DFhigh. DFhigh limited global vertical COM displacements in favour of horizontal progression during ground contact. Despite these running kinematics differences, no significant difference in EC was observed between groups. Therefore, both DF strategies seem energetically efficient at endurance running speeds.

AB - A lower duty factor (DF) reflects a greater relative contribution of leg swing versus ground contact time during the running step. Increasing time on the ground has been reported in the scientific literature to both increase and decrease the energy cost (EC) of running, with DF reported to be highly variable in runners. As increasing running speed aligns running kinematics more closely with spring–mass model behaviours and re-use of elastic energy, we compared the centre of mass (COM) displacement and EC between runners with a low (DFlow) and high (DFhigh) duty factor at typical endurance running speeds. Forty well-trained runners were divided in two groups based on their mean DF measured across a range of speeds. EC was measured from 4 min treadmill runs at 10, 12 and 14 km h−1 using indirect calorimetry. Temporal characteristics and COM displacement data of the running step were recorded from 30 s treadmill runs at 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 km h−1. Across speeds, DFlow exhibited more symmetrical patterns between braking and propulsion phases in terms of time and vertical COM displacement than DFhigh. DFhigh limited global vertical COM displacements in favour of horizontal progression during ground contact. Despite these running kinematics differences, no significant difference in EC was observed between groups. Therefore, both DF strategies seem energetically efficient at endurance running speeds.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Energy cost

KW - Running form

KW - Self-optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063292755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063292755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.192047

DO - 10.1242/jeb.192047

M3 - Article

VL - 222

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 6

M1 - jeb192047

ER -