Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation

Patrik Winiger, August Andersson, Sabine Eckhardt, Andreas Stohl, Igor P. Semiletov, Oleg V. Dudarev, Alexander Charkin, Natalia Shakhova, Zbigniew Klimont, Chris Heyes, Örjan Gustafsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Black carbon (BC) in haze and deposited on snow and ice can have strong effects on the radiative balance of the Arctic. There is a geographic bias in Arctic BC studies toward the Atlantic sector, with lack of observational constraints for the extensive Russian Siberian Arctic, spanning nearly half of the circum-Arctic. Here, 2 y of observations at Tiksi (East Siberian Arctic) establish a strong seasonality in both BC concentrations (8 ng·m-3 to 302 ng·m-3) and dual-isotope-constrained sources (19 to 73% contribution from biomass burning). Comparisons between observations and a dispersion model, coupled to an anthropogenic emissions inventory and a fire emissions inventory, give mixed results. In the European Arctic, this model has proven to simulate BC concentrations and source contributions well. However, the model is less successful in reproducing BC concentrations and sources for the Russian Arctic. Using a Bayesian approach, we show that, in contrast to earlier studies, contributions from gas flaring (6%), power plants (9%), and open fires (12%) are relatively small, with the major sources instead being domestic (35%) and transport (38%). The observation-based evaluation of reported emissions identifies errors in spatial allocation of BC sources in the inventory and highlights the importance of improving emission distribution and source attribution, to develop reliable mitigation strategies for efficient reduction of BC impact on the Russian Arctic, one of the fastest-warming regions on Earth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E1054-E1061
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume114
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

black carbon
emission inventory
haze
biomass burning
seasonality
power plant
mitigation
warming
snow
isotope
ice
gas

Keywords

  • Arctic haze
  • Atmospheric transport modeling
  • Carbon isotopes
  • Climate change
  • Emission inventory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation. / Winiger, Patrik; Andersson, August; Eckhardt, Sabine; Stohl, Andreas; Semiletov, Igor P.; Dudarev, Oleg V.; Charkin, Alexander; Shakhova, Natalia; Klimont, Zbigniew; Heyes, Chris; Gustafsson, Örjan.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 114, No. 7, 14.02.2017, p. E1054-E1061.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winiger, Patrik ; Andersson, August ; Eckhardt, Sabine ; Stohl, Andreas ; Semiletov, Igor P. ; Dudarev, Oleg V. ; Charkin, Alexander ; Shakhova, Natalia ; Klimont, Zbigniew ; Heyes, Chris ; Gustafsson, Örjan. / Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017 ; Vol. 114, No. 7. pp. E1054-E1061.
@article{1d93144b61f94c31a07cbc70328af9a0,
title = "Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation",
abstract = "Black carbon (BC) in haze and deposited on snow and ice can have strong effects on the radiative balance of the Arctic. There is a geographic bias in Arctic BC studies toward the Atlantic sector, with lack of observational constraints for the extensive Russian Siberian Arctic, spanning nearly half of the circum-Arctic. Here, 2 y of observations at Tiksi (East Siberian Arctic) establish a strong seasonality in both BC concentrations (8 ng·m-3 to 302 ng·m-3) and dual-isotope-constrained sources (19 to 73{\%} contribution from biomass burning). Comparisons between observations and a dispersion model, coupled to an anthropogenic emissions inventory and a fire emissions inventory, give mixed results. In the European Arctic, this model has proven to simulate BC concentrations and source contributions well. However, the model is less successful in reproducing BC concentrations and sources for the Russian Arctic. Using a Bayesian approach, we show that, in contrast to earlier studies, contributions from gas flaring (6{\%}), power plants (9{\%}), and open fires (12{\%}) are relatively small, with the major sources instead being domestic (35{\%}) and transport (38{\%}). The observation-based evaluation of reported emissions identifies errors in spatial allocation of BC sources in the inventory and highlights the importance of improving emission distribution and source attribution, to develop reliable mitigation strategies for efficient reduction of BC impact on the Russian Arctic, one of the fastest-warming regions on Earth.",
keywords = "Arctic haze, Atmospheric transport modeling, Carbon isotopes, Climate change, Emission inventory",
author = "Patrik Winiger and August Andersson and Sabine Eckhardt and Andreas Stohl and Semiletov, {Igor P.} and Dudarev, {Oleg V.} and Alexander Charkin and Natalia Shakhova and Zbigniew Klimont and Chris Heyes and {\"O}rjan Gustafsson",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1613401114",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "E1054--E1061",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation

AU - Winiger, Patrik

AU - Andersson, August

AU - Eckhardt, Sabine

AU - Stohl, Andreas

AU - Semiletov, Igor P.

AU - Dudarev, Oleg V.

AU - Charkin, Alexander

AU - Shakhova, Natalia

AU - Klimont, Zbigniew

AU - Heyes, Chris

AU - Gustafsson, Örjan

PY - 2017/2/14

Y1 - 2017/2/14

N2 - Black carbon (BC) in haze and deposited on snow and ice can have strong effects on the radiative balance of the Arctic. There is a geographic bias in Arctic BC studies toward the Atlantic sector, with lack of observational constraints for the extensive Russian Siberian Arctic, spanning nearly half of the circum-Arctic. Here, 2 y of observations at Tiksi (East Siberian Arctic) establish a strong seasonality in both BC concentrations (8 ng·m-3 to 302 ng·m-3) and dual-isotope-constrained sources (19 to 73% contribution from biomass burning). Comparisons between observations and a dispersion model, coupled to an anthropogenic emissions inventory and a fire emissions inventory, give mixed results. In the European Arctic, this model has proven to simulate BC concentrations and source contributions well. However, the model is less successful in reproducing BC concentrations and sources for the Russian Arctic. Using a Bayesian approach, we show that, in contrast to earlier studies, contributions from gas flaring (6%), power plants (9%), and open fires (12%) are relatively small, with the major sources instead being domestic (35%) and transport (38%). The observation-based evaluation of reported emissions identifies errors in spatial allocation of BC sources in the inventory and highlights the importance of improving emission distribution and source attribution, to develop reliable mitigation strategies for efficient reduction of BC impact on the Russian Arctic, one of the fastest-warming regions on Earth.

AB - Black carbon (BC) in haze and deposited on snow and ice can have strong effects on the radiative balance of the Arctic. There is a geographic bias in Arctic BC studies toward the Atlantic sector, with lack of observational constraints for the extensive Russian Siberian Arctic, spanning nearly half of the circum-Arctic. Here, 2 y of observations at Tiksi (East Siberian Arctic) establish a strong seasonality in both BC concentrations (8 ng·m-3 to 302 ng·m-3) and dual-isotope-constrained sources (19 to 73% contribution from biomass burning). Comparisons between observations and a dispersion model, coupled to an anthropogenic emissions inventory and a fire emissions inventory, give mixed results. In the European Arctic, this model has proven to simulate BC concentrations and source contributions well. However, the model is less successful in reproducing BC concentrations and sources for the Russian Arctic. Using a Bayesian approach, we show that, in contrast to earlier studies, contributions from gas flaring (6%), power plants (9%), and open fires (12%) are relatively small, with the major sources instead being domestic (35%) and transport (38%). The observation-based evaluation of reported emissions identifies errors in spatial allocation of BC sources in the inventory and highlights the importance of improving emission distribution and source attribution, to develop reliable mitigation strategies for efficient reduction of BC impact on the Russian Arctic, one of the fastest-warming regions on Earth.

KW - Arctic haze

KW - Atmospheric transport modeling

KW - Carbon isotopes

KW - Climate change

KW - Emission inventory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013032183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013032183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1613401114

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1613401114

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - E1054-E1061

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 7

ER -