ResEval Mash: A mashup tool for advanced research evaluation

Muhammad Imran, Felix Kling, Stefano Soi, Florian Daniel, Fabio Casati, Maurizio Marchese

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

11 Citations (Scopus)


In this demonstration, we present ResEval Mash, a mashup platform for research evaluation, i.e., for the assessment of the productivity or quality of researchers, teams, institutions, journals, and the like - a topic most of us are acquainted with. The platform is specifically tailored to the need of sourcing data about scientific publications and researchers from the Web, aggregating them, computing metrics (also complex and ad-hoc ones), and visualizing them. ResEval Mash is a hosted mashup platform with a clientside editor and runtime engine, both running inside a common web browser. It supports the processing of also large amounts of data, a feature that is achieved via the sensible distribution of the respective computation steps over client and server. Our preliminary user study shows that ResEval Mash indeed has the power to enable domain experts to develop own mashups (research evaluation metrics); other mashup platforms rather support skilled developers. The reason for this success is ResEval Mash's domain-specificity. Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWWW'12 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web Companion
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web, WWW'12 - Lyon, France
Duration: 16 Apr 201220 Apr 2012


Conference21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web, WWW'12


  • Domain-specific mashup
  • End-user development
  • Mashup
  • Research evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ResEval Mash: A mashup tool for advanced research evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this