Abstract
In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 77-83 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | NDT and E International |
| Volume | 102 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- CFRP
- Impact damage
- Probability of detection
- Thermography
- Ultrasonic testing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science(all)
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Mechanical Engineering
Cite this
Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels. / Duan, Yuxia; Zhang, Hai; Maldague, Xavier P.V.; Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente; Servais, Pierre; Genest, Marc; Sfarra, Stefano; Meng, Jianqiao.
In: NDT and E International, Vol. 102, 01.03.2019, p. 77-83.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability assessment of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing for impact damage of CFRP panels
AU - Duan, Yuxia
AU - Zhang, Hai
AU - Maldague, Xavier P.V.
AU - Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente
AU - Servais, Pierre
AU - Genest, Marc
AU - Sfarra, Stefano
AU - Meng, Jianqiao
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.
AB - In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels.
KW - CFRP
KW - Impact damage
KW - Probability of detection
KW - Thermography
KW - Ultrasonic testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059303379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059303379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059303379
VL - 102
SP - 77
EP - 83
JO - NDT and E International
JF - NDT and E International
SN - 0963-8695
ER -