Abstract
In this work we propose an approach to prioritizing order of transmission of sensed data in wireless sensor network that are very popular in, for example, environmental monitoring. The approach is based on determination of a consensus relation which is in "nearest distance" from all initial rankings shaped by multiple sensors of each network node. Statistically and probabilistically based analytical models useful for assuring network performance and providing reasonable number values n-k and m are proposed and discussed, where n-k is a number of packets transmitted to the sink; n is a number of the network sensor nodes; k is a number of dropped packets due to a congestion; and m is a number of node sensors (or rankings).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 12th IMEKO TC1 Education and Training in Measurement and Instrumentation and TC7 Measurement Science Joint Symposium on "Man, Science and Measurement" 2008 |
| Pages | 277-282 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Event | 12th IMEKO TC1 Education and Training in Measurement and Instrumentation and TC7 Measurement Science Joint Symposium on "Man, Science and Measurement" 2008 - Annecy, France Duration: 3 Sep 2008 → 5 Sep 2008 |
Other
| Other | 12th IMEKO TC1 Education and Training in Measurement and Instrumentation and TC7 Measurement Science Joint Symposium on "Man, Science and Measurement" 2008 |
|---|---|
| Country | France |
| City | Annecy |
| Period | 3.9.08 → 5.9.08 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Consensus relation
- Rankings
- Sensor data fusion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biomedical Engineering
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Environmental Engineering
Cite this
Muravyov, S., Chan, M. C., & Khomyakova, M. (2008). Prioritizing sensed data transmission by consensus relation in wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 12th IMEKO TC1 Education and Training in Measurement and Instrumentation and TC7 Measurement Science Joint Symposium on "Man, Science and Measurement" 2008 (pp. 277-282)