Pragmatics among linguistic disciplines: Problems of definition and classification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Until the mid-20th century, the term "pragmatics" was employed by different fields of research (such as semiotics, philosophy, sociology, psychology), which made the content of the term very wide and ambiguous. Due to the emergence and development of linguistically oriented pragmatics, it became necessary to define the place of pragmatics in relation to linguistics and to determine the range of tasks it serves to accomplish. There are three ways to interpret the relationship between pragmatics and linguistics: 1) pragmatics is a separate discipline closely related to linguistics; 2) pragmatics is a branch of linguistics; 3) pragmatics belongs to a certain branch of linguistics. The article discusses these three possibilities with reference to the existing literature. Pragmatics is postulated as a discipline of its own, if it is developed as a cross-disciplinary theoretical approach (Habermas 1998, Mey 2001). When considered among other branches of linguistics, it is referred to as pragmalinguistics or linguistic pragmatics. Nowadays, this is the most widespread point of view found in many linguistic dictionaries and handbooks (Akhmanova 1966, Norman 2009, Bußmann 1990, Ernst 2002, etc.). Those who view pragmatics as part of a certain branch of linguistics, usually attribute it to text linguistics or semantics (Lyons 2003, Heinemann and Viehweger 1991). In conclusion, the author proposes another interpretation: In addition to core linguistics, applied linguistics, interdisciplinary linguistics and other possible subdivisions, it is expedient to distinguish communicational linguistics. Pragmatics makes part of it, alongside with phonetics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-115
Number of pages18
JournalRussian Journal of Linguistics
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

pragmatics
linguistics
Linguistic Pragmatics
phonetics
semiotics
dictionary
sociology
psychology
semantics
interpretation

Keywords

  • classification
  • communication
  • linguistics
  • pragmalinguistics
  • pragmatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Pragmatics among linguistic disciplines : Problems of definition and classification. / Kotorova, Elizaveta.

In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 98-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91d0be18ece4433eb35de26b3364f632,
title = "Pragmatics among linguistic disciplines: Problems of definition and classification",
abstract = "Until the mid-20th century, the term {"}pragmatics{"} was employed by different fields of research (such as semiotics, philosophy, sociology, psychology), which made the content of the term very wide and ambiguous. Due to the emergence and development of linguistically oriented pragmatics, it became necessary to define the place of pragmatics in relation to linguistics and to determine the range of tasks it serves to accomplish. There are three ways to interpret the relationship between pragmatics and linguistics: 1) pragmatics is a separate discipline closely related to linguistics; 2) pragmatics is a branch of linguistics; 3) pragmatics belongs to a certain branch of linguistics. The article discusses these three possibilities with reference to the existing literature. Pragmatics is postulated as a discipline of its own, if it is developed as a cross-disciplinary theoretical approach (Habermas 1998, Mey 2001). When considered among other branches of linguistics, it is referred to as pragmalinguistics or linguistic pragmatics. Nowadays, this is the most widespread point of view found in many linguistic dictionaries and handbooks (Akhmanova 1966, Norman 2009, Bu{\ss}mann 1990, Ernst 2002, etc.). Those who view pragmatics as part of a certain branch of linguistics, usually attribute it to text linguistics or semantics (Lyons 2003, Heinemann and Viehweger 1991). In conclusion, the author proposes another interpretation: In addition to core linguistics, applied linguistics, interdisciplinary linguistics and other possible subdivisions, it is expedient to distinguish communicational linguistics. Pragmatics makes part of it, alongside with phonetics.",
keywords = "classification, communication, linguistics, pragmalinguistics, pragmatics",
author = "Elizaveta Kotorova",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-98-115",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "98--115",
journal = "Russian Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "2312-9182",
publisher = "RUDN University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatics among linguistic disciplines

T2 - Problems of definition and classification

AU - Kotorova, Elizaveta

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Until the mid-20th century, the term "pragmatics" was employed by different fields of research (such as semiotics, philosophy, sociology, psychology), which made the content of the term very wide and ambiguous. Due to the emergence and development of linguistically oriented pragmatics, it became necessary to define the place of pragmatics in relation to linguistics and to determine the range of tasks it serves to accomplish. There are three ways to interpret the relationship between pragmatics and linguistics: 1) pragmatics is a separate discipline closely related to linguistics; 2) pragmatics is a branch of linguistics; 3) pragmatics belongs to a certain branch of linguistics. The article discusses these three possibilities with reference to the existing literature. Pragmatics is postulated as a discipline of its own, if it is developed as a cross-disciplinary theoretical approach (Habermas 1998, Mey 2001). When considered among other branches of linguistics, it is referred to as pragmalinguistics or linguistic pragmatics. Nowadays, this is the most widespread point of view found in many linguistic dictionaries and handbooks (Akhmanova 1966, Norman 2009, Bußmann 1990, Ernst 2002, etc.). Those who view pragmatics as part of a certain branch of linguistics, usually attribute it to text linguistics or semantics (Lyons 2003, Heinemann and Viehweger 1991). In conclusion, the author proposes another interpretation: In addition to core linguistics, applied linguistics, interdisciplinary linguistics and other possible subdivisions, it is expedient to distinguish communicational linguistics. Pragmatics makes part of it, alongside with phonetics.

AB - Until the mid-20th century, the term "pragmatics" was employed by different fields of research (such as semiotics, philosophy, sociology, psychology), which made the content of the term very wide and ambiguous. Due to the emergence and development of linguistically oriented pragmatics, it became necessary to define the place of pragmatics in relation to linguistics and to determine the range of tasks it serves to accomplish. There are three ways to interpret the relationship between pragmatics and linguistics: 1) pragmatics is a separate discipline closely related to linguistics; 2) pragmatics is a branch of linguistics; 3) pragmatics belongs to a certain branch of linguistics. The article discusses these three possibilities with reference to the existing literature. Pragmatics is postulated as a discipline of its own, if it is developed as a cross-disciplinary theoretical approach (Habermas 1998, Mey 2001). When considered among other branches of linguistics, it is referred to as pragmalinguistics or linguistic pragmatics. Nowadays, this is the most widespread point of view found in many linguistic dictionaries and handbooks (Akhmanova 1966, Norman 2009, Bußmann 1990, Ernst 2002, etc.). Those who view pragmatics as part of a certain branch of linguistics, usually attribute it to text linguistics or semantics (Lyons 2003, Heinemann and Viehweger 1991). In conclusion, the author proposes another interpretation: In addition to core linguistics, applied linguistics, interdisciplinary linguistics and other possible subdivisions, it is expedient to distinguish communicational linguistics. Pragmatics makes part of it, alongside with phonetics.

KW - classification

KW - communication

KW - linguistics

KW - pragmalinguistics

KW - pragmatics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064106355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064106355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-98-115

DO - 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-98-115

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064106355

VL - 23

SP - 98

EP - 115

JO - Russian Journal of Linguistics

JF - Russian Journal of Linguistics

SN - 2312-9182

IS - 1

ER -