Mining monotowns in Russia

G. Yu Boyarko, E. G. Matyugina, O. V. Pogharnitskaya, L. S. Grinkevich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors discuss the issues and ways of improvement of monotown territories accommodating mining and metallurgical plants. The range of the problems faced by the single-industry towns due to the direct relation between the town development and the major employer activity is presented along with the factors that govern the economic efficiency of the major employer. The state of the mining monotowns in Russia is reviewed, and the monotowns are grouped relative to the activity of the major employer (iron ore mining and ferrous metallurgy; coal production; nonferrous metallurgy; uranium extraction and processing; cement production; diamond mining, etc.). The current condition of the single-industry towns in diff erent branches of industry is analyzed. The emphasis is laid on mining settlements in the extreme northern areas where it is necessary to move residents-employees to more comfortable regions after mine closure. It is shown that it is typical of majority of the single-industry towns engaged in the same industrial activity that they generate clusters of settlements, which favors cooperation and integration of personnel and initiates ef ective pendulum internal migration of residents between unfortunate and fortunate centers of agglomeration. The data on inhabited agglomerations, including mining monotowns, are presented. The discussed scenarios of economical re-arrangement of monotowns are backed by case studies. The authors prove the leading role of the State that administers and supports business activity in the single-industry towns and in adjacent territory (Monotown Development Foundation, establishment of territories of advanced social-andeconomic development, etc.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-10
Number of pages7
JournalGornyi Zhurnal
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

industry
Industry
Metallurgy
metallurgy
agglomeration
Diamond mines
Agglomeration
Personnel
coal production
internal migration
Iron ores
social development
Pendulums
iron ore
Uranium
diamond
uranium
Cements
cement
Coal

Keywords

  • Agglomeration
  • Economical diversification
  • Governmental regulation
  • Mining plants
  • Monotown

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Boyarko, G. Y., Matyugina, E. G., Pogharnitskaya, O. V., & Grinkevich, L. S. (2017). Mining monotowns in Russia. Gornyi Zhurnal, (1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01

Mining monotowns in Russia. / Boyarko, G. Yu; Matyugina, E. G.; Pogharnitskaya, O. V.; Grinkevich, L. S.

In: Gornyi Zhurnal, No. 1, 2017, p. 4-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boyarko, GY, Matyugina, EG, Pogharnitskaya, OV & Grinkevich, LS 2017, 'Mining monotowns in Russia', Gornyi Zhurnal, no. 1, pp. 4-10. https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01
Boyarko GY, Matyugina EG, Pogharnitskaya OV, Grinkevich LS. Mining monotowns in Russia. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017;(1):4-10. https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01
Boyarko, G. Yu ; Matyugina, E. G. ; Pogharnitskaya, O. V. ; Grinkevich, L. S. / Mining monotowns in Russia. In: Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017 ; No. 1. pp. 4-10.
@article{047ce96225854121949b67cc6e892616,
title = "Mining monotowns in Russia",
abstract = "The authors discuss the issues and ways of improvement of monotown territories accommodating mining and metallurgical plants. The range of the problems faced by the single-industry towns due to the direct relation between the town development and the major employer activity is presented along with the factors that govern the economic efficiency of the major employer. The state of the mining monotowns in Russia is reviewed, and the monotowns are grouped relative to the activity of the major employer (iron ore mining and ferrous metallurgy; coal production; nonferrous metallurgy; uranium extraction and processing; cement production; diamond mining, etc.). The current condition of the single-industry towns in diff erent branches of industry is analyzed. The emphasis is laid on mining settlements in the extreme northern areas where it is necessary to move residents-employees to more comfortable regions after mine closure. It is shown that it is typical of majority of the single-industry towns engaged in the same industrial activity that they generate clusters of settlements, which favors cooperation and integration of personnel and initiates ef ective pendulum internal migration of residents between unfortunate and fortunate centers of agglomeration. The data on inhabited agglomerations, including mining monotowns, are presented. The discussed scenarios of economical re-arrangement of monotowns are backed by case studies. The authors prove the leading role of the State that administers and supports business activity in the single-industry towns and in adjacent territory (Monotown Development Foundation, establishment of territories of advanced social-andeconomic development, etc.).",
keywords = "Agglomeration, Economical diversification, Governmental regulation, Mining plants, Monotown",
author = "Boyarko, {G. Yu} and Matyugina, {E. G.} and Pogharnitskaya, {O. V.} and Grinkevich, {L. S.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01",
language = "English",
pages = "4--10",
journal = "Gornyi Zhurnal",
issn = "0017-2278",
publisher = "Izdatel'stvo Ruda i Metally",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mining monotowns in Russia

AU - Boyarko, G. Yu

AU - Matyugina, E. G.

AU - Pogharnitskaya, O. V.

AU - Grinkevich, L. S.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The authors discuss the issues and ways of improvement of monotown territories accommodating mining and metallurgical plants. The range of the problems faced by the single-industry towns due to the direct relation between the town development and the major employer activity is presented along with the factors that govern the economic efficiency of the major employer. The state of the mining monotowns in Russia is reviewed, and the monotowns are grouped relative to the activity of the major employer (iron ore mining and ferrous metallurgy; coal production; nonferrous metallurgy; uranium extraction and processing; cement production; diamond mining, etc.). The current condition of the single-industry towns in diff erent branches of industry is analyzed. The emphasis is laid on mining settlements in the extreme northern areas where it is necessary to move residents-employees to more comfortable regions after mine closure. It is shown that it is typical of majority of the single-industry towns engaged in the same industrial activity that they generate clusters of settlements, which favors cooperation and integration of personnel and initiates ef ective pendulum internal migration of residents between unfortunate and fortunate centers of agglomeration. The data on inhabited agglomerations, including mining monotowns, are presented. The discussed scenarios of economical re-arrangement of monotowns are backed by case studies. The authors prove the leading role of the State that administers and supports business activity in the single-industry towns and in adjacent territory (Monotown Development Foundation, establishment of territories of advanced social-andeconomic development, etc.).

AB - The authors discuss the issues and ways of improvement of monotown territories accommodating mining and metallurgical plants. The range of the problems faced by the single-industry towns due to the direct relation between the town development and the major employer activity is presented along with the factors that govern the economic efficiency of the major employer. The state of the mining monotowns in Russia is reviewed, and the monotowns are grouped relative to the activity of the major employer (iron ore mining and ferrous metallurgy; coal production; nonferrous metallurgy; uranium extraction and processing; cement production; diamond mining, etc.). The current condition of the single-industry towns in diff erent branches of industry is analyzed. The emphasis is laid on mining settlements in the extreme northern areas where it is necessary to move residents-employees to more comfortable regions after mine closure. It is shown that it is typical of majority of the single-industry towns engaged in the same industrial activity that they generate clusters of settlements, which favors cooperation and integration of personnel and initiates ef ective pendulum internal migration of residents between unfortunate and fortunate centers of agglomeration. The data on inhabited agglomerations, including mining monotowns, are presented. The discussed scenarios of economical re-arrangement of monotowns are backed by case studies. The authors prove the leading role of the State that administers and supports business activity in the single-industry towns and in adjacent territory (Monotown Development Foundation, establishment of territories of advanced social-andeconomic development, etc.).

KW - Agglomeration

KW - Economical diversification

KW - Governmental regulation

KW - Mining plants

KW - Monotown

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012928612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012928612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01

DO - 10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85012928612

SP - 4

EP - 10

JO - Gornyi Zhurnal

JF - Gornyi Zhurnal

SN - 0017-2278

IS - 1

ER -