Abstract
Interlaboratory comparisons need a reference value of the measurand to be assigned. It is necessary to have some procedure that allows to determine the reference value at a maximum number of participating laboratories results to be included into the determination and, at the same time, unreliable laboratory results must be disregarded. It is shown in the paper that this procedure can be implemented using a preference aggregation approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 14th Joint International IMEKO TC1, TC7, TC13 Symposium on Intelligent Quality Measurements - Theory, Education and Training 2011, Held in Conj. with the 56th IWK Ilmenau University of Technology |
| Pages | 69-73 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | 14th Joint International IMEKO TC1, TC7, TC13 Symposium on Intelligent Quality Measurements - Theory, Education and Training 2011, Held in Conjunction with the 56th IWK Ilmenau University of Technology - Jena, Germany Duration: 31 Aug 2011 → 2 Sep 2011 |
Other
| Other | 14th Joint International IMEKO TC1, TC7, TC13 Symposium on Intelligent Quality Measurements - Theory, Education and Training 2011, Held in Conjunction with the 56th IWK Ilmenau University of Technology |
|---|---|
| Country | Germany |
| City | Jena |
| Period | 31.8.11 → 2.9.11 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Consensus relation
- Interlaboratory comparisons
- Preference aggregation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Artificial Intelligence
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Cite this
Largest consistent subsets in interlaboratory comparisons : Preference aggregation approach. / Muravyov, Sergey V.; Marinushkina, Irina A.
14th Joint International IMEKO TC1, TC7, TC13 Symposium on Intelligent Quality Measurements - Theory, Education and Training 2011, Held in Conj. with the 56th IWK Ilmenau University of Technology. 2011. p. 69-73.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Largest consistent subsets in interlaboratory comparisons
T2 - Preference aggregation approach
AU - Muravyov, Sergey V.
AU - Marinushkina, Irina A.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Interlaboratory comparisons need a reference value of the measurand to be assigned. It is necessary to have some procedure that allows to determine the reference value at a maximum number of participating laboratories results to be included into the determination and, at the same time, unreliable laboratory results must be disregarded. It is shown in the paper that this procedure can be implemented using a preference aggregation approach.
AB - Interlaboratory comparisons need a reference value of the measurand to be assigned. It is necessary to have some procedure that allows to determine the reference value at a maximum number of participating laboratories results to be included into the determination and, at the same time, unreliable laboratory results must be disregarded. It is shown in the paper that this procedure can be implemented using a preference aggregation approach.
KW - Consensus relation
KW - Interlaboratory comparisons
KW - Preference aggregation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872579286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872579286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84872579286
SN - 9781618393067
SP - 69
EP - 73
BT - 14th Joint International IMEKO TC1, TC7, TC13 Symposium on Intelligent Quality Measurements - Theory, Education and Training 2011, Held in Conj. with the 56th IWK Ilmenau University of Technology
ER -