Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure

Ewa Soppa, Jens Nellesen, Varvara Romanova, Gottfried Fischer, Horst Artur Crostack, Felix Beckmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To investigate the effect of model thickness on simulated strain and stress fields in two-phase materials three-dimensional and two-dimensional finite element simulations were performed. The microstructure of the models was generated both by a stochastic procedure and by transforming computer tomograms representing the microstructure into a FE mesh (artificial and realistic models, respectively). The simulated equivalent plastic strains at the surface of the realistic model were compared to equivalent strain maps obtained by digital image correlation of SEM images. The results of this study demonstrate that 2D FE simulations generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of two-phase materials adequately. The calculated distribution of surface strain coincides with the measured one only if the thickness of 3D model exceeds a minimum value that corresponds to microstructural length scale of the material. Therefore, the thickness should be equal or larger than this minimum to get correct results at the surface.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)802-811
Number of pages10
JournalMaterials Science and Engineering A
Volume527
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

microstructure
Microstructure
simulation
stress distribution
mesh
Plastic deformation
plastics
Scanning electron microscopy
scanning electron microscopy

Keywords

  • Computer tomography
  • Finite element analysis
  • Micromechanical modelling
  • Microstructure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Soppa, E., Nellesen, J., Romanova, V., Fischer, G., Crostack, H. A., & Beckmann, F. (2010). Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure. Materials Science and Engineering A, 527(3), 802-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.004

Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure. / Soppa, Ewa; Nellesen, Jens; Romanova, Varvara; Fischer, Gottfried; Crostack, Horst Artur; Beckmann, Felix.

In: Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 527, No. 3, 15.01.2010, p. 802-811.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soppa, E, Nellesen, J, Romanova, V, Fischer, G, Crostack, HA & Beckmann, F 2010, 'Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure', Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 527, no. 3, pp. 802-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.004
Soppa E, Nellesen J, Romanova V, Fischer G, Crostack HA, Beckmann F. Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010 Jan 15;527(3):802-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.004
Soppa, Ewa ; Nellesen, Jens ; Romanova, Varvara ; Fischer, Gottfried ; Crostack, Horst Artur ; Beckmann, Felix. / Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure. In: Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010 ; Vol. 527, No. 3. pp. 802-811.
@article{dd9bcdfd51dc45a881a50c71bc506844,
title = "Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure",
abstract = "To investigate the effect of model thickness on simulated strain and stress fields in two-phase materials three-dimensional and two-dimensional finite element simulations were performed. The microstructure of the models was generated both by a stochastic procedure and by transforming computer tomograms representing the microstructure into a FE mesh (artificial and realistic models, respectively). The simulated equivalent plastic strains at the surface of the realistic model were compared to equivalent strain maps obtained by digital image correlation of SEM images. The results of this study demonstrate that 2D FE simulations generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of two-phase materials adequately. The calculated distribution of surface strain coincides with the measured one only if the thickness of 3D model exceeds a minimum value that corresponds to microstructural length scale of the material. Therefore, the thickness should be equal or larger than this minimum to get correct results at the surface.",
keywords = "Computer tomography, Finite element analysis, Micromechanical modelling, Microstructure",
author = "Ewa Soppa and Jens Nellesen and Varvara Romanova and Gottfried Fischer and Crostack, {Horst Artur} and Felix Beckmann",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "527",
pages = "802--811",
journal = "Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing",
issn = "0921-5093",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of 3D-model thickness on FE-simulations of microstructure

AU - Soppa, Ewa

AU - Nellesen, Jens

AU - Romanova, Varvara

AU - Fischer, Gottfried

AU - Crostack, Horst Artur

AU - Beckmann, Felix

PY - 2010/1/15

Y1 - 2010/1/15

N2 - To investigate the effect of model thickness on simulated strain and stress fields in two-phase materials three-dimensional and two-dimensional finite element simulations were performed. The microstructure of the models was generated both by a stochastic procedure and by transforming computer tomograms representing the microstructure into a FE mesh (artificial and realistic models, respectively). The simulated equivalent plastic strains at the surface of the realistic model were compared to equivalent strain maps obtained by digital image correlation of SEM images. The results of this study demonstrate that 2D FE simulations generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of two-phase materials adequately. The calculated distribution of surface strain coincides with the measured one only if the thickness of 3D model exceeds a minimum value that corresponds to microstructural length scale of the material. Therefore, the thickness should be equal or larger than this minimum to get correct results at the surface.

AB - To investigate the effect of model thickness on simulated strain and stress fields in two-phase materials three-dimensional and two-dimensional finite element simulations were performed. The microstructure of the models was generated both by a stochastic procedure and by transforming computer tomograms representing the microstructure into a FE mesh (artificial and realistic models, respectively). The simulated equivalent plastic strains at the surface of the realistic model were compared to equivalent strain maps obtained by digital image correlation of SEM images. The results of this study demonstrate that 2D FE simulations generally do not describe the mechanical behaviour of two-phase materials adequately. The calculated distribution of surface strain coincides with the measured one only if the thickness of 3D model exceeds a minimum value that corresponds to microstructural length scale of the material. Therefore, the thickness should be equal or larger than this minimum to get correct results at the surface.

KW - Computer tomography

KW - Finite element analysis

KW - Micromechanical modelling

KW - Microstructure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149122947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72149122947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.004

M3 - Article

VL - 527

SP - 802

EP - 811

JO - Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing

JF - Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing

SN - 0921-5093

IS - 3

ER -