Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques

Irina Fotina, Johannes Hopfgartner, Markus Stock, Thomas Steininger, Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig, Dietmar Georg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of different HU adjustments for CBCT-based dose calculation. Methods and materials: Dose calculation was performed on CBCT images of 30 patients. In the first two approaches phantom-based (Pha-CC) and population-based (Pop-CC) conversion curves were used. The third method (WAB) represents override of the structures with standard densities for water, air and bone. In ROI mapping approach all structures were overridden with average HUs from planning CT. All techniques were benchmarked to the Pop-CC and CT-based plans by DVH comparison and γ-index analysis. Results: For prostate plans, WAB and ROI mapping compared to Pop-CC showed differences in PTV Dmedian below 2%. The WAB and Pha-CC methods underestimated the bladder dose in IMRT plans. In lung cases PTV coverage was underestimated by Pha-CC method by 2.3% and slightly overestimated by the WAB and ROI techniques. The use of the Pha-CC method for head-neck IMRT plans resulted in difference in PTV coverage up to 5%. Dose calculation with WAB and ROI techniques showed better agreement with pCT than conversion curve-based approaches. Conclusions: Density override techniques provide an accurate alternative to the conversion curve-based methods for dose calculation on CBCT images.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-256
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostate
Urinary Bladder
Neck
Air
Head
Bone and Bones
Lung
Water
Population

Keywords

  • Cone-beam CT
  • Dose calculation
  • Hounsfield units

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Hematology

Cite this

Fotina, I., Hopfgartner, J., Stock, M., Steininger, T., Lütgendorf-Caucig, C., & Georg, D. (2012). Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 104(2), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.007

Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation : Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques. / Fotina, Irina; Hopfgartner, Johannes; Stock, Markus; Steininger, Thomas; Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola; Georg, Dietmar.

In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 104, No. 2, 08.2012, p. 249-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fotina, I, Hopfgartner, J, Stock, M, Steininger, T, Lütgendorf-Caucig, C & Georg, D 2012, 'Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques', Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.007
Fotina I, Hopfgartner J, Stock M, Steininger T, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Georg D. Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2012 Aug;104(2):249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.007
Fotina, Irina ; Hopfgartner, Johannes ; Stock, Markus ; Steininger, Thomas ; Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola ; Georg, Dietmar. / Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation : Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques. In: Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 104, No. 2. pp. 249-256.
@article{d55f1704029f4d62916ce2c32cdaf922,
title = "Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques",
abstract = "Background and purpose: The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of different HU adjustments for CBCT-based dose calculation. Methods and materials: Dose calculation was performed on CBCT images of 30 patients. In the first two approaches phantom-based (Pha-CC) and population-based (Pop-CC) conversion curves were used. The third method (WAB) represents override of the structures with standard densities for water, air and bone. In ROI mapping approach all structures were overridden with average HUs from planning CT. All techniques were benchmarked to the Pop-CC and CT-based plans by DVH comparison and γ-index analysis. Results: For prostate plans, WAB and ROI mapping compared to Pop-CC showed differences in PTV Dmedian below 2{\%}. The WAB and Pha-CC methods underestimated the bladder dose in IMRT plans. In lung cases PTV coverage was underestimated by Pha-CC method by 2.3{\%} and slightly overestimated by the WAB and ROI techniques. The use of the Pha-CC method for head-neck IMRT plans resulted in difference in PTV coverage up to 5{\%}. Dose calculation with WAB and ROI techniques showed better agreement with pCT than conversion curve-based approaches. Conclusions: Density override techniques provide an accurate alternative to the conversion curve-based methods for dose calculation on CBCT images.",
keywords = "Cone-beam CT, Dose calculation, Hounsfield units",
author = "Irina Fotina and Johannes Hopfgartner and Markus Stock and Thomas Steininger and Carola L{\"u}tgendorf-Caucig and Dietmar Georg",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.007",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "249--256",
journal = "Radiotherapy and Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation

T2 - Comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques

AU - Fotina, Irina

AU - Hopfgartner, Johannes

AU - Stock, Markus

AU - Steininger, Thomas

AU - Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola

AU - Georg, Dietmar

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Background and purpose: The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of different HU adjustments for CBCT-based dose calculation. Methods and materials: Dose calculation was performed on CBCT images of 30 patients. In the first two approaches phantom-based (Pha-CC) and population-based (Pop-CC) conversion curves were used. The third method (WAB) represents override of the structures with standard densities for water, air and bone. In ROI mapping approach all structures were overridden with average HUs from planning CT. All techniques were benchmarked to the Pop-CC and CT-based plans by DVH comparison and γ-index analysis. Results: For prostate plans, WAB and ROI mapping compared to Pop-CC showed differences in PTV Dmedian below 2%. The WAB and Pha-CC methods underestimated the bladder dose in IMRT plans. In lung cases PTV coverage was underestimated by Pha-CC method by 2.3% and slightly overestimated by the WAB and ROI techniques. The use of the Pha-CC method for head-neck IMRT plans resulted in difference in PTV coverage up to 5%. Dose calculation with WAB and ROI techniques showed better agreement with pCT than conversion curve-based approaches. Conclusions: Density override techniques provide an accurate alternative to the conversion curve-based methods for dose calculation on CBCT images.

AB - Background and purpose: The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of different HU adjustments for CBCT-based dose calculation. Methods and materials: Dose calculation was performed on CBCT images of 30 patients. In the first two approaches phantom-based (Pha-CC) and population-based (Pop-CC) conversion curves were used. The third method (WAB) represents override of the structures with standard densities for water, air and bone. In ROI mapping approach all structures were overridden with average HUs from planning CT. All techniques were benchmarked to the Pop-CC and CT-based plans by DVH comparison and γ-index analysis. Results: For prostate plans, WAB and ROI mapping compared to Pop-CC showed differences in PTV Dmedian below 2%. The WAB and Pha-CC methods underestimated the bladder dose in IMRT plans. In lung cases PTV coverage was underestimated by Pha-CC method by 2.3% and slightly overestimated by the WAB and ROI techniques. The use of the Pha-CC method for head-neck IMRT plans resulted in difference in PTV coverage up to 5%. Dose calculation with WAB and ROI techniques showed better agreement with pCT than conversion curve-based approaches. Conclusions: Density override techniques provide an accurate alternative to the conversion curve-based methods for dose calculation on CBCT images.

KW - Cone-beam CT

KW - Dose calculation

KW - Hounsfield units

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865792210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865792210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22809588

AN - SCOPUS:84865792210

VL - 104

SP - 249

EP - 256

JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 2

ER -