Emissions in the combustion of coal and coal-processing wastes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Power stations based on traditional hydrocarbon fuels—in particular, coal—are characterized by considerable atmospheric emissions. In the light of the annual increase in coal consumption and the ongoing environmental deterioration, significant decrease in atmospheric emissions per unit mass of coal consumed must be regarded as a high priority. In the present work, SO2, CO2, CO, NO, and NO2 emissions from power plants around the world are analyzed. The emissions formed in the combustion of traditional types of Russian coal and their processing wastes (filter cakes) are compared. The benefits of using coal–water slurry containing coal-processing wastes at power plants are outlined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-176
Number of pages6
JournalCoke and Chemistry
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

coal processing
Coal
power plant
combustion
coal
Processing
Power plants
slurry
Carbon Monoxide
Hydrocarbons
hydrocarbon
Deterioration
atmospheric emission

Keywords

  • atmospheric emissions
  • coal
  • coal–water slurry
  • combustion
  • energy sources
  • filter cake

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Fuel Technology
  • Process Chemistry and Technology

Cite this

Emissions in the combustion of coal and coal-processing wastes. / Nyashina, G. S.; Shlegel, N. E.; Strizhak, P. A.

In: Coke and Chemistry, Vol. 60, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 171-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13d6360302aa4aa8989fd0325cb70ba0,
title = "Emissions in the combustion of coal and coal-processing wastes",
abstract = "Power stations based on traditional hydrocarbon fuels—in particular, coal—are characterized by considerable atmospheric emissions. In the light of the annual increase in coal consumption and the ongoing environmental deterioration, significant decrease in atmospheric emissions per unit mass of coal consumed must be regarded as a high priority. In the present work, SO2, CO2, CO, NO, and NO2 emissions from power plants around the world are analyzed. The emissions formed in the combustion of traditional types of Russian coal and their processing wastes (filter cakes) are compared. The benefits of using coal–water slurry containing coal-processing wastes at power plants are outlined.",
keywords = "atmospheric emissions, coal, coal–water slurry, combustion, energy sources, filter cake",
author = "Nyashina, {G. S.} and Shlegel, {N. E.} and Strizhak, {P. A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3103/S1068364X17040056",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "171--176",
journal = "Coke and Chemistry",
issn = "1068-364X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emissions in the combustion of coal and coal-processing wastes

AU - Nyashina, G. S.

AU - Shlegel, N. E.

AU - Strizhak, P. A.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Power stations based on traditional hydrocarbon fuels—in particular, coal—are characterized by considerable atmospheric emissions. In the light of the annual increase in coal consumption and the ongoing environmental deterioration, significant decrease in atmospheric emissions per unit mass of coal consumed must be regarded as a high priority. In the present work, SO2, CO2, CO, NO, and NO2 emissions from power plants around the world are analyzed. The emissions formed in the combustion of traditional types of Russian coal and their processing wastes (filter cakes) are compared. The benefits of using coal–water slurry containing coal-processing wastes at power plants are outlined.

AB - Power stations based on traditional hydrocarbon fuels—in particular, coal—are characterized by considerable atmospheric emissions. In the light of the annual increase in coal consumption and the ongoing environmental deterioration, significant decrease in atmospheric emissions per unit mass of coal consumed must be regarded as a high priority. In the present work, SO2, CO2, CO, NO, and NO2 emissions from power plants around the world are analyzed. The emissions formed in the combustion of traditional types of Russian coal and their processing wastes (filter cakes) are compared. The benefits of using coal–water slurry containing coal-processing wastes at power plants are outlined.

KW - atmospheric emissions

KW - coal

KW - coal–water slurry

KW - combustion

KW - energy sources

KW - filter cake

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025598766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025598766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3103/S1068364X17040056

DO - 10.3103/S1068364X17040056

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 171

EP - 176

JO - Coke and Chemistry

JF - Coke and Chemistry

SN - 1068-364X

IS - 4

ER -