Effect of minimal shoes and slope on vertical and leg stiffness during running

Thibault Lussiana, Kim Hébert-Losier, Laurent Mourot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to characterize and compare the vertical (kvert) and leg (kleg) stiffness measured during running in two different footwear conditions on negative, level, and positive slopes, using kinematic data only. Methods: Fourteen male recreational runners (age 23.4 ± 4.4 years, height 177.5 ± 5.2 cm, and body mass 69.5 ± 5.3 kg) were tested on 2 separate days within 1 week. At each session, subjects ran seven 5-min trials on a treadmill at 10 km/h, interspersed with 5min of sitting passive recovery. Each trial was performed on a different slope gradient, ranging from -8% (downhill) to +8% (uphill), assigned in a random order. Furthermore, each subject ran one 5-min trial wearing minimal shoes (MS) and the subsequent trial wearing traditional shoes (TS) in a counter-balanced randomized order ensuring that each slope was ran once in MS and once in TS. Kinematic data were collected using a photocell measuring system and high-speed video camera, with kvert and kleg stiffness being calculated from these data. Results: Leg compression, contact times, and vertical displacement of the center of mass during running were significantly smaller in MS compared to TS across all slopes. In the two footwear conditions, step frequency significantly increased with a (positive) increase in slope. Kinematic analyses indicated that kleg was greater when running in MS than TS and this between-footwear difference remained similar across slopes. On the contrary, kvert did not change on the basis of footwear, but increased with positive increases in slope. Conclusion: This study showed that kvert and kleg during running respond differently to change in footwear and/or slope. These two stiffness measures can hence provide a unique insight on the biomechanical adaptations of running under varying conditions and their respective quantification may assist in furthering our understanding of training, performance, and/or injury in this sport.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-202
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sport and Health Science
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shoes
Leg
Biomechanical Phenomena
Athletic Injuries

Keywords

  • Incline
  • Minimal shoes
  • Running
  • Spring-mass model
  • Stiffness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of minimal shoes and slope on vertical and leg stiffness during running. / Lussiana, Thibault; Hébert-Losier, Kim; Mourot, Laurent.

In: Journal of Sport and Health Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 195-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49fd060eba3a47c38997aac9b30e57b5,
title = "Effect of minimal shoes and slope on vertical and leg stiffness during running",
abstract = "Purpose: This study was designed to characterize and compare the vertical (kvert) and leg (kleg) stiffness measured during running in two different footwear conditions on negative, level, and positive slopes, using kinematic data only. Methods: Fourteen male recreational runners (age 23.4 ± 4.4 years, height 177.5 ± 5.2 cm, and body mass 69.5 ± 5.3 kg) were tested on 2 separate days within 1 week. At each session, subjects ran seven 5-min trials on a treadmill at 10 km/h, interspersed with 5min of sitting passive recovery. Each trial was performed on a different slope gradient, ranging from -8{\%} (downhill) to +8{\%} (uphill), assigned in a random order. Furthermore, each subject ran one 5-min trial wearing minimal shoes (MS) and the subsequent trial wearing traditional shoes (TS) in a counter-balanced randomized order ensuring that each slope was ran once in MS and once in TS. Kinematic data were collected using a photocell measuring system and high-speed video camera, with kvert and kleg stiffness being calculated from these data. Results: Leg compression, contact times, and vertical displacement of the center of mass during running were significantly smaller in MS compared to TS across all slopes. In the two footwear conditions, step frequency significantly increased with a (positive) increase in slope. Kinematic analyses indicated that kleg was greater when running in MS than TS and this between-footwear difference remained similar across slopes. On the contrary, kvert did not change on the basis of footwear, but increased with positive increases in slope. Conclusion: This study showed that kvert and kleg during running respond differently to change in footwear and/or slope. These two stiffness measures can hence provide a unique insight on the biomechanical adaptations of running under varying conditions and their respective quantification may assist in furthering our understanding of training, performance, and/or injury in this sport.",
keywords = "Incline, Minimal shoes, Running, Spring-mass model, Stiffness",
author = "Thibault Lussiana and Kim H{\'e}bert-Losier and Laurent Mourot",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jshs.2013.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "195--202",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Health Science",
issn = "2095-2546",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of minimal shoes and slope on vertical and leg stiffness during running

AU - Lussiana, Thibault

AU - Hébert-Losier, Kim

AU - Mourot, Laurent

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Purpose: This study was designed to characterize and compare the vertical (kvert) and leg (kleg) stiffness measured during running in two different footwear conditions on negative, level, and positive slopes, using kinematic data only. Methods: Fourteen male recreational runners (age 23.4 ± 4.4 years, height 177.5 ± 5.2 cm, and body mass 69.5 ± 5.3 kg) were tested on 2 separate days within 1 week. At each session, subjects ran seven 5-min trials on a treadmill at 10 km/h, interspersed with 5min of sitting passive recovery. Each trial was performed on a different slope gradient, ranging from -8% (downhill) to +8% (uphill), assigned in a random order. Furthermore, each subject ran one 5-min trial wearing minimal shoes (MS) and the subsequent trial wearing traditional shoes (TS) in a counter-balanced randomized order ensuring that each slope was ran once in MS and once in TS. Kinematic data were collected using a photocell measuring system and high-speed video camera, with kvert and kleg stiffness being calculated from these data. Results: Leg compression, contact times, and vertical displacement of the center of mass during running were significantly smaller in MS compared to TS across all slopes. In the two footwear conditions, step frequency significantly increased with a (positive) increase in slope. Kinematic analyses indicated that kleg was greater when running in MS than TS and this between-footwear difference remained similar across slopes. On the contrary, kvert did not change on the basis of footwear, but increased with positive increases in slope. Conclusion: This study showed that kvert and kleg during running respond differently to change in footwear and/or slope. These two stiffness measures can hence provide a unique insight on the biomechanical adaptations of running under varying conditions and their respective quantification may assist in furthering our understanding of training, performance, and/or injury in this sport.

AB - Purpose: This study was designed to characterize and compare the vertical (kvert) and leg (kleg) stiffness measured during running in two different footwear conditions on negative, level, and positive slopes, using kinematic data only. Methods: Fourteen male recreational runners (age 23.4 ± 4.4 years, height 177.5 ± 5.2 cm, and body mass 69.5 ± 5.3 kg) were tested on 2 separate days within 1 week. At each session, subjects ran seven 5-min trials on a treadmill at 10 km/h, interspersed with 5min of sitting passive recovery. Each trial was performed on a different slope gradient, ranging from -8% (downhill) to +8% (uphill), assigned in a random order. Furthermore, each subject ran one 5-min trial wearing minimal shoes (MS) and the subsequent trial wearing traditional shoes (TS) in a counter-balanced randomized order ensuring that each slope was ran once in MS and once in TS. Kinematic data were collected using a photocell measuring system and high-speed video camera, with kvert and kleg stiffness being calculated from these data. Results: Leg compression, contact times, and vertical displacement of the center of mass during running were significantly smaller in MS compared to TS across all slopes. In the two footwear conditions, step frequency significantly increased with a (positive) increase in slope. Kinematic analyses indicated that kleg was greater when running in MS than TS and this between-footwear difference remained similar across slopes. On the contrary, kvert did not change on the basis of footwear, but increased with positive increases in slope. Conclusion: This study showed that kvert and kleg during running respond differently to change in footwear and/or slope. These two stiffness measures can hence provide a unique insight on the biomechanical adaptations of running under varying conditions and their respective quantification may assist in furthering our understanding of training, performance, and/or injury in this sport.

KW - Incline

KW - Minimal shoes

KW - Running

KW - Spring-mass model

KW - Stiffness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006184857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006184857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.09.004

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 195

EP - 202

JO - Journal of Sport and Health Science

JF - Journal of Sport and Health Science

SN - 2095-2546

IS - 2

ER -