Destination development in Western Siberia

tourism governance and evolutionary economic geography

Henrik Halkier, Dieter K. Müller, Natalia A. Goncharova, Liliya Kiriyanova, Irina A. Kolupanova, Konstantin V. Yumatov, Nataliya S. Yakimova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Tourism development has often been identified as a tool for balancing negative effects of economic restructuring, especially in peripheral regions. Tourism-based activities often utilize the availability of abundant nature, but although most English language studies of destination development are presented from western contexts, examples from post-Soviet Russia are rare. Western Siberia is a periphery with access to natural resources and heavy industrialization but remotely located from domestic (Russian) and international markets, where tourism is often considered a saviour, especially for the regional economies. Stakeholders in this Russian resource periphery face challenges in managing governance and cooperation in destinations development due to frequent institutional, economic and social changes. Using evolutionary economic geography and based on primary sources and interview data, tourism development and stakeholder relations are assessed in three Western Siberia regions: Tomsk, Kemerovo and Altai Krai. Findings show that for tourism to make a significant contribution, it must be more central to the economic development agenda in all three regions. However, it is currently only achieving a permanent high-profile in one of them, being crowded out by other (mostly primary) industries in the other two. Although the specific tourism governance set-up varies between the three regions, it is clear that public tourism governance still sits somewhat uneasily between state control and the market economy. Tourism receives substantial public subsidies, especially in large-scale investment projects, which depend on federal support within a governance system where decentralization seems to be somewhat limited and unstable. As a result, the tourism path development in the Siberian periphery is highly dependent on state intervention and success in other sectors.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTourism Geographies
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Siberia
economic geography
tourism
Tourism
governance
tourism development
stakeholder
tourism market
peripheral region
regional economy
social change
decentralization
economics
industrialization
Governance
Evolutionary economic geography
Destination development
institutional economics
economic development
natural resource

Keywords

  • destination governance
  • path dependency
  • Russian Federation
  • Siberia
  • Tourism destination development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Halkier, H., Müller, D. K., Goncharova, N. A., Kiriyanova, L., Kolupanova, I. A., Yumatov, K. V., & Yakimova, N. S. (Accepted/In press). Destination development in Western Siberia: tourism governance and evolutionary economic geography. Tourism Geographies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1490808

Destination development in Western Siberia : tourism governance and evolutionary economic geography. / Halkier, Henrik; Müller, Dieter K.; Goncharova, Natalia A.; Kiriyanova, Liliya; Kolupanova, Irina A.; Yumatov, Konstantin V.; Yakimova, Nataliya S.

In: Tourism Geographies, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halkier, Henrik ; Müller, Dieter K. ; Goncharova, Natalia A. ; Kiriyanova, Liliya ; Kolupanova, Irina A. ; Yumatov, Konstantin V. ; Yakimova, Nataliya S. / Destination development in Western Siberia : tourism governance and evolutionary economic geography. In: Tourism Geographies. 2018.
@article{5f79de4b423b4176b78e6577997d160c,
title = "Destination development in Western Siberia: tourism governance and evolutionary economic geography",
abstract = "Tourism development has often been identified as a tool for balancing negative effects of economic restructuring, especially in peripheral regions. Tourism-based activities often utilize the availability of abundant nature, but although most English language studies of destination development are presented from western contexts, examples from post-Soviet Russia are rare. Western Siberia is a periphery with access to natural resources and heavy industrialization but remotely located from domestic (Russian) and international markets, where tourism is often considered a saviour, especially for the regional economies. Stakeholders in this Russian resource periphery face challenges in managing governance and cooperation in destinations development due to frequent institutional, economic and social changes. Using evolutionary economic geography and based on primary sources and interview data, tourism development and stakeholder relations are assessed in three Western Siberia regions: Tomsk, Kemerovo and Altai Krai. Findings show that for tourism to make a significant contribution, it must be more central to the economic development agenda in all three regions. However, it is currently only achieving a permanent high-profile in one of them, being crowded out by other (mostly primary) industries in the other two. Although the specific tourism governance set-up varies between the three regions, it is clear that public tourism governance still sits somewhat uneasily between state control and the market economy. Tourism receives substantial public subsidies, especially in large-scale investment projects, which depend on federal support within a governance system where decentralization seems to be somewhat limited and unstable. As a result, the tourism path development in the Siberian periphery is highly dependent on state intervention and success in other sectors.",
keywords = "destination governance, path dependency, Russian Federation, Siberia, Tourism destination development",
author = "Henrik Halkier and M{\"u}ller, {Dieter K.} and Goncharova, {Natalia A.} and Liliya Kiriyanova and Kolupanova, {Irina A.} and Yumatov, {Konstantin V.} and Yakimova, {Nataliya S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14616688.2018.1490808",
language = "English",
journal = "Tourism Geographies",
issn = "1461-6688",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Destination development in Western Siberia

T2 - tourism governance and evolutionary economic geography

AU - Halkier, Henrik

AU - Müller, Dieter K.

AU - Goncharova, Natalia A.

AU - Kiriyanova, Liliya

AU - Kolupanova, Irina A.

AU - Yumatov, Konstantin V.

AU - Yakimova, Nataliya S.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Tourism development has often been identified as a tool for balancing negative effects of economic restructuring, especially in peripheral regions. Tourism-based activities often utilize the availability of abundant nature, but although most English language studies of destination development are presented from western contexts, examples from post-Soviet Russia are rare. Western Siberia is a periphery with access to natural resources and heavy industrialization but remotely located from domestic (Russian) and international markets, where tourism is often considered a saviour, especially for the regional economies. Stakeholders in this Russian resource periphery face challenges in managing governance and cooperation in destinations development due to frequent institutional, economic and social changes. Using evolutionary economic geography and based on primary sources and interview data, tourism development and stakeholder relations are assessed in three Western Siberia regions: Tomsk, Kemerovo and Altai Krai. Findings show that for tourism to make a significant contribution, it must be more central to the economic development agenda in all three regions. However, it is currently only achieving a permanent high-profile in one of them, being crowded out by other (mostly primary) industries in the other two. Although the specific tourism governance set-up varies between the three regions, it is clear that public tourism governance still sits somewhat uneasily between state control and the market economy. Tourism receives substantial public subsidies, especially in large-scale investment projects, which depend on federal support within a governance system where decentralization seems to be somewhat limited and unstable. As a result, the tourism path development in the Siberian periphery is highly dependent on state intervention and success in other sectors.

AB - Tourism development has often been identified as a tool for balancing negative effects of economic restructuring, especially in peripheral regions. Tourism-based activities often utilize the availability of abundant nature, but although most English language studies of destination development are presented from western contexts, examples from post-Soviet Russia are rare. Western Siberia is a periphery with access to natural resources and heavy industrialization but remotely located from domestic (Russian) and international markets, where tourism is often considered a saviour, especially for the regional economies. Stakeholders in this Russian resource periphery face challenges in managing governance and cooperation in destinations development due to frequent institutional, economic and social changes. Using evolutionary economic geography and based on primary sources and interview data, tourism development and stakeholder relations are assessed in three Western Siberia regions: Tomsk, Kemerovo and Altai Krai. Findings show that for tourism to make a significant contribution, it must be more central to the economic development agenda in all three regions. However, it is currently only achieving a permanent high-profile in one of them, being crowded out by other (mostly primary) industries in the other two. Although the specific tourism governance set-up varies between the three regions, it is clear that public tourism governance still sits somewhat uneasily between state control and the market economy. Tourism receives substantial public subsidies, especially in large-scale investment projects, which depend on federal support within a governance system where decentralization seems to be somewhat limited and unstable. As a result, the tourism path development in the Siberian periphery is highly dependent on state intervention and success in other sectors.

KW - destination governance

KW - path dependency

KW - Russian Federation

KW - Siberia

KW - Tourism destination development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056134608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056134608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14616688.2018.1490808

DO - 10.1080/14616688.2018.1490808

M3 - Article

JO - Tourism Geographies

JF - Tourism Geographies

SN - 1461-6688

ER -