Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets

The influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability

Gabriela Altorjai, Irina Fotina, Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig, Markus Stock, Richard Pötter, Dietmar Georg, Karin Dieckmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated. Methods and Materials: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient. Results: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17% with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21% variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI genA = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI genB = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability. Conclusion: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Observer Variation
delineation
lungs
cones
Lung
Radiosurgery
tumors
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
metastasis
Neoplasm Metastasis
lesions
Neoplasms
radiation therapy
coefficients
cancer
Thoracic Wall
Tumor Burden
spicules
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • CBCT
  • Conformity index
  • Interobserver variability
  • SBRT
  • Target volume delineation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets : The influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability. / Altorjai, Gabriela; Fotina, Irina; Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola; Stock, Markus; Pötter, Richard; Georg, Dietmar; Dieckmann, Karin.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 82, No. 2, 01.02.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Altorjai, Gabriela ; Fotina, Irina ; Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola ; Stock, Markus ; Pötter, Richard ; Georg, Dietmar ; Dieckmann, Karin. / Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets : The influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2012 ; Vol. 82, No. 2.
@article{4b7be07c28214101a3d5859d691e3f89,
title = "Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets: The influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability",
abstract = "Purpose: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated. Methods and Materials: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient. Results: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17{\%} with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21{\%} variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI genA = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI genB = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability. Conclusion: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.",
keywords = "CBCT, Conformity index, Interobserver variability, SBRT, Target volume delineation",
author = "Gabriela Altorjai and Irina Fotina and Carola L{\"u}tgendorf-Caucig and Markus Stock and Richard P{\"o}tter and Dietmar Georg and Karin Dieckmann",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.042",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets

T2 - The influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability

AU - Altorjai, Gabriela

AU - Fotina, Irina

AU - Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola

AU - Stock, Markus

AU - Pötter, Richard

AU - Georg, Dietmar

AU - Dieckmann, Karin

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Purpose: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated. Methods and Materials: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient. Results: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17% with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21% variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI genA = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI genB = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability. Conclusion: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.

AB - Purpose: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated. Methods and Materials: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient. Results: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17% with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21% variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI genA = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI genB = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability. Conclusion: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.

KW - CBCT

KW - Conformity index

KW - Interobserver variability

KW - SBRT

KW - Target volume delineation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855855264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855855264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.042

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.042

M3 - Article

VL - 82

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

ER -