Comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation with advanced kernel methods in external photon beam treatment planning

I. Fotina, B. Kroupa, D. Georg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

After successful implementation in commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for high energy electron beams, Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms are becoming also commercially available for high energy photon beams. On the other hand, advanced kernel based methods are in clinical use for many years. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of both types of dose calculation in phantom studies and clinical situations. The treatment planning systems investigated were Oncentra Masterplan (Nucletron, V3.0) with a collapsed cone (CC) convolution algorithm, Eclipse (Varian, V8.1), iPlan (BrainLAB, V4.0.0) and Monaco (CMS, V1.0.2). The latter two TPS offer XVMC based Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation. Commissioning of the first three systems was performed for an ELEKTA Synergy platform providing 6, 10 and 18MV beams. The Eclipse system was commissioned for a Varian Clinac with 6 and 15 MV. Measurements were performed with a calibrated ionization chamber and radiochromic EBT type films. Single field test cases and IMRT treatments were delivered to an inhomogeneous phantom where cork was used to simulate lung. In addition, the calculation was compared in patient geometry using 7 different IMRT cases. More specifically, MC generated plans were recalculated with the CC algorithm. Dosimetric comparisons included single points, and 1D as well as 2D gamma evaluations together with the use of independent fluence recalculation software. Absolute dosimetry revealed no large differences between MC and advance kernel dose calculation. 1D γ -evaluation showed that CC and the AAA algorithms were not able to model the penumbra broadening, build up and re-build up region behind the polystyrene plate and target as correctly as the MC algorithms. The dose calculation accuracy for the IMRT cases in patient geometry was found to be similar for CC and MC. Dose calculation speed was also assessed in the light of future demands for on-line treatment planning.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIFMBE Proceedings
Pages604-607
Number of pages4
Volume25
Edition1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventWorld Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering: Radiation Oncology - Munich, Germany
Duration: 7 Sep 200912 Sep 2009

Other

OtherWorld Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering: Radiation Oncology
CountryGermany
CityMunich
Period7.9.0912.9.09

Fingerprint

Photons
Planning
Cones
Ionization chambers
Geometry
Polystyrenes
Convolution
Dosimetry
Electron beams

Keywords

  • AAA algorithm
  • Collapsed cone algorithm
  • IMRT planning
  • Monte Carlo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation with advanced kernel methods in external photon beam treatment planning. / Fotina, I.; Kroupa, B.; Georg, D.

IFMBE Proceedings. Vol. 25 1. ed. 2009. p. 604-607.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Fotina, I, Kroupa, B & Georg, D 2009, Comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation with advanced kernel methods in external photon beam treatment planning. in IFMBE Proceedings. 1 edn, vol. 25, pp. 604-607, World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering: Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany, 7.9.09. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9-170
Fotina, I. ; Kroupa, B. ; Georg, D. / Comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation with advanced kernel methods in external photon beam treatment planning. IFMBE Proceedings. Vol. 25 1. ed. 2009. pp. 604-607
@inproceedings{f244e922b5a84a9180028214e544bec7,
title = "Comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation with advanced kernel methods in external photon beam treatment planning",
abstract = "After successful implementation in commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for high energy electron beams, Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms are becoming also commercially available for high energy photon beams. On the other hand, advanced kernel based methods are in clinical use for many years. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of both types of dose calculation in phantom studies and clinical situations. The treatment planning systems investigated were Oncentra Masterplan (Nucletron, V3.0) with a collapsed cone (CC) convolution algorithm, Eclipse (Varian, V8.1), iPlan (BrainLAB, V4.0.0) and Monaco (CMS, V1.0.2). The latter two TPS offer XVMC based Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation. Commissioning of the first three systems was performed for an ELEKTA Synergy platform providing 6, 10 and 18MV beams. The Eclipse system was commissioned for a Varian Clinac with 6 and 15 MV. Measurements were performed with a calibrated ionization chamber and radiochromic EBT type films. Single field test cases and IMRT treatments were delivered to an inhomogeneous phantom where cork was used to simulate lung. In addition, the calculation was compared in patient geometry using 7 different IMRT cases. More specifically, MC generated plans were recalculated with the CC algorithm. Dosimetric comparisons included single points, and 1D as well as 2D gamma evaluations together with the use of independent fluence recalculation software. Absolute dosimetry revealed no large differences between MC and advance kernel dose calculation. 1D γ -evaluation showed that CC and the AAA algorithms were not able to model the penumbra broadening, build up and re-build up region behind the polystyrene plate and target as correctly as the MC algorithms. The dose calculation accuracy for the IMRT cases in patient geometry was found to be similar for CC and MC. Dose calculation speed was also assessed in the light of future demands for on-line treatment planning.",
keywords = "AAA algorithm, Collapsed cone algorithm, IMRT planning, Monte Carlo",
author = "I. Fotina and B. Kroupa and D. Georg",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9-170",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783642034725",
volume = "25",
pages = "604--607",
booktitle = "IFMBE Proceedings",
edition = "1",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation with advanced kernel methods in external photon beam treatment planning

AU - Fotina, I.

AU - Kroupa, B.

AU - Georg, D.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - After successful implementation in commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for high energy electron beams, Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms are becoming also commercially available for high energy photon beams. On the other hand, advanced kernel based methods are in clinical use for many years. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of both types of dose calculation in phantom studies and clinical situations. The treatment planning systems investigated were Oncentra Masterplan (Nucletron, V3.0) with a collapsed cone (CC) convolution algorithm, Eclipse (Varian, V8.1), iPlan (BrainLAB, V4.0.0) and Monaco (CMS, V1.0.2). The latter two TPS offer XVMC based Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation. Commissioning of the first three systems was performed for an ELEKTA Synergy platform providing 6, 10 and 18MV beams. The Eclipse system was commissioned for a Varian Clinac with 6 and 15 MV. Measurements were performed with a calibrated ionization chamber and radiochromic EBT type films. Single field test cases and IMRT treatments were delivered to an inhomogeneous phantom where cork was used to simulate lung. In addition, the calculation was compared in patient geometry using 7 different IMRT cases. More specifically, MC generated plans were recalculated with the CC algorithm. Dosimetric comparisons included single points, and 1D as well as 2D gamma evaluations together with the use of independent fluence recalculation software. Absolute dosimetry revealed no large differences between MC and advance kernel dose calculation. 1D γ -evaluation showed that CC and the AAA algorithms were not able to model the penumbra broadening, build up and re-build up region behind the polystyrene plate and target as correctly as the MC algorithms. The dose calculation accuracy for the IMRT cases in patient geometry was found to be similar for CC and MC. Dose calculation speed was also assessed in the light of future demands for on-line treatment planning.

AB - After successful implementation in commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for high energy electron beams, Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms are becoming also commercially available for high energy photon beams. On the other hand, advanced kernel based methods are in clinical use for many years. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of both types of dose calculation in phantom studies and clinical situations. The treatment planning systems investigated were Oncentra Masterplan (Nucletron, V3.0) with a collapsed cone (CC) convolution algorithm, Eclipse (Varian, V8.1), iPlan (BrainLAB, V4.0.0) and Monaco (CMS, V1.0.2). The latter two TPS offer XVMC based Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation. Commissioning of the first three systems was performed for an ELEKTA Synergy platform providing 6, 10 and 18MV beams. The Eclipse system was commissioned for a Varian Clinac with 6 and 15 MV. Measurements were performed with a calibrated ionization chamber and radiochromic EBT type films. Single field test cases and IMRT treatments were delivered to an inhomogeneous phantom where cork was used to simulate lung. In addition, the calculation was compared in patient geometry using 7 different IMRT cases. More specifically, MC generated plans were recalculated with the CC algorithm. Dosimetric comparisons included single points, and 1D as well as 2D gamma evaluations together with the use of independent fluence recalculation software. Absolute dosimetry revealed no large differences between MC and advance kernel dose calculation. 1D γ -evaluation showed that CC and the AAA algorithms were not able to model the penumbra broadening, build up and re-build up region behind the polystyrene plate and target as correctly as the MC algorithms. The dose calculation accuracy for the IMRT cases in patient geometry was found to be similar for CC and MC. Dose calculation speed was also assessed in the light of future demands for on-line treatment planning.

KW - AAA algorithm

KW - Collapsed cone algorithm

KW - IMRT planning

KW - Monte Carlo

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950410166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950410166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9-170

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9-170

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:77950410166

SN - 9783642034725

VL - 25

SP - 604

EP - 607

BT - IFMBE Proceedings

ER -