Clay mineralogy and unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA. I. Occurrence and interpretation of mixed-layer R3 ordered illite/smectite

M. J. Wilson, M. V. Shaldybin, Robin Looft-Wilson

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The mineralogy of many of the major unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA, which span practically the whole spectrum of Phanerozoic time, is reviewed from a survey of relevant published literature. This survey reveals that there is a remarkable uniformity in the mineralogy of these shales, both with regard to non-clay minerals but particularly to the clay minerals. It was found that the clay mineralogy of practically all of the shale reservoirs older than the Upper Cretaceous are dominated by illitic clays, both in discrete form and as illite-dominated, mixed-layer, illite-smectite (I/S). The layer stacking arrangement of the latter is of the long-range type described as R3, such that every smectite layer tends to be preceded and succeeded by three illite layers in a sequence like IIISIIIS. Such material is conventionally interpreted (a) as having formed from a smectite precursor, (b) as existing in MacEwan-type crystallites consisting of about 5 to 15 unit layers in thickness where there is three-dimensional regularity across the smectite interlayers, and (c) as having interlayers of a truly smectitic character. Using evidence from the fundamental particle concept of Nadeau et al. (1984b) this interpretation is rejected. Instead, it is proposed that R3-type I/S (a) forms de novo, crystallizing from pore waters of appropriate chemical composition in a particular pressure and temperature stability field, as it does in conventional sandstone reservoirs, (b) consists primarily of thin illite crystallites or crystals <. 50 Å in thickness, and (c) that the "smectite" interlayers can be accounted for by the ability of such thin illite stacks, which have no three-dimensional register between the fundamental particles when sedimented onto glass slides, to adsorb ethylene glycol between the particles so leading to a false diagnosis of "smectite". This interpretation could have major consequences on the physicochemical properties of the shale, a matter that is examined more closely in the second part of this review.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)31-50
    Number of pages20
    JournalEarth-Science Reviews
    Volume158
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

    Fingerprint

    illite
    smectite
    mixed layer
    shale
    mineralogy
    hydrocarbon
    clay
    fundamental particle
    physicochemical property
    Phanerozoic
    stacking
    ethylene
    clay mineral
    porewater
    glass
    chemical composition
    sandstone
    crystal
    Cretaceous
    mineral

    Keywords

    • Clay Mineralogy
    • Fundamental Particles
    • Illite
    • Permeability
    • Porosity
    • Shale
    • Unconventional Reservoirs

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Clay mineralogy and unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA. I. Occurrence and interpretation of mixed-layer R3 ordered illite/smectite. / Wilson, M. J.; Shaldybin, M. V.; Looft-Wilson, Robin.

    In: Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 158, 01.07.2016, p. 31-50.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    @article{bbf44637946a4a64a49af246212df881,
    title = "Clay mineralogy and unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA. I. Occurrence and interpretation of mixed-layer R3 ordered illite/smectite",
    abstract = "The mineralogy of many of the major unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA, which span practically the whole spectrum of Phanerozoic time, is reviewed from a survey of relevant published literature. This survey reveals that there is a remarkable uniformity in the mineralogy of these shales, both with regard to non-clay minerals but particularly to the clay minerals. It was found that the clay mineralogy of practically all of the shale reservoirs older than the Upper Cretaceous are dominated by illitic clays, both in discrete form and as illite-dominated, mixed-layer, illite-smectite (I/S). The layer stacking arrangement of the latter is of the long-range type described as R3, such that every smectite layer tends to be preceded and succeeded by three illite layers in a sequence like IIISIIIS. Such material is conventionally interpreted (a) as having formed from a smectite precursor, (b) as existing in MacEwan-type crystallites consisting of about 5 to 15 unit layers in thickness where there is three-dimensional regularity across the smectite interlayers, and (c) as having interlayers of a truly smectitic character. Using evidence from the fundamental particle concept of Nadeau et al. (1984b) this interpretation is rejected. Instead, it is proposed that R3-type I/S (a) forms de novo, crystallizing from pore waters of appropriate chemical composition in a particular pressure and temperature stability field, as it does in conventional sandstone reservoirs, (b) consists primarily of thin illite crystallites or crystals <. 50 {\AA} in thickness, and (c) that the {"}smectite{"} interlayers can be accounted for by the ability of such thin illite stacks, which have no three-dimensional register between the fundamental particles when sedimented onto glass slides, to adsorb ethylene glycol between the particles so leading to a false diagnosis of {"}smectite{"}. This interpretation could have major consequences on the physicochemical properties of the shale, a matter that is examined more closely in the second part of this review.",
    keywords = "Clay Mineralogy, Fundamental Particles, Illite, Permeability, Porosity, Shale, Unconventional Reservoirs",
    author = "Wilson, {M. J.} and Shaldybin, {M. V.} and Robin Looft-Wilson",
    year = "2016",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "158",
    pages = "31--50",
    journal = "Earth-Science Reviews",
    issn = "0012-8252",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Clay mineralogy and unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA. I. Occurrence and interpretation of mixed-layer R3 ordered illite/smectite

    AU - Wilson, M. J.

    AU - Shaldybin, M. V.

    AU - Looft-Wilson, Robin

    PY - 2016/7/1

    Y1 - 2016/7/1

    N2 - The mineralogy of many of the major unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA, which span practically the whole spectrum of Phanerozoic time, is reviewed from a survey of relevant published literature. This survey reveals that there is a remarkable uniformity in the mineralogy of these shales, both with regard to non-clay minerals but particularly to the clay minerals. It was found that the clay mineralogy of practically all of the shale reservoirs older than the Upper Cretaceous are dominated by illitic clays, both in discrete form and as illite-dominated, mixed-layer, illite-smectite (I/S). The layer stacking arrangement of the latter is of the long-range type described as R3, such that every smectite layer tends to be preceded and succeeded by three illite layers in a sequence like IIISIIIS. Such material is conventionally interpreted (a) as having formed from a smectite precursor, (b) as existing in MacEwan-type crystallites consisting of about 5 to 15 unit layers in thickness where there is three-dimensional regularity across the smectite interlayers, and (c) as having interlayers of a truly smectitic character. Using evidence from the fundamental particle concept of Nadeau et al. (1984b) this interpretation is rejected. Instead, it is proposed that R3-type I/S (a) forms de novo, crystallizing from pore waters of appropriate chemical composition in a particular pressure and temperature stability field, as it does in conventional sandstone reservoirs, (b) consists primarily of thin illite crystallites or crystals <. 50 Å in thickness, and (c) that the "smectite" interlayers can be accounted for by the ability of such thin illite stacks, which have no three-dimensional register between the fundamental particles when sedimented onto glass slides, to adsorb ethylene glycol between the particles so leading to a false diagnosis of "smectite". This interpretation could have major consequences on the physicochemical properties of the shale, a matter that is examined more closely in the second part of this review.

    AB - The mineralogy of many of the major unconventional hydrocarbon shale reservoirs in the USA, which span practically the whole spectrum of Phanerozoic time, is reviewed from a survey of relevant published literature. This survey reveals that there is a remarkable uniformity in the mineralogy of these shales, both with regard to non-clay minerals but particularly to the clay minerals. It was found that the clay mineralogy of practically all of the shale reservoirs older than the Upper Cretaceous are dominated by illitic clays, both in discrete form and as illite-dominated, mixed-layer, illite-smectite (I/S). The layer stacking arrangement of the latter is of the long-range type described as R3, such that every smectite layer tends to be preceded and succeeded by three illite layers in a sequence like IIISIIIS. Such material is conventionally interpreted (a) as having formed from a smectite precursor, (b) as existing in MacEwan-type crystallites consisting of about 5 to 15 unit layers in thickness where there is three-dimensional regularity across the smectite interlayers, and (c) as having interlayers of a truly smectitic character. Using evidence from the fundamental particle concept of Nadeau et al. (1984b) this interpretation is rejected. Instead, it is proposed that R3-type I/S (a) forms de novo, crystallizing from pore waters of appropriate chemical composition in a particular pressure and temperature stability field, as it does in conventional sandstone reservoirs, (b) consists primarily of thin illite crystallites or crystals <. 50 Å in thickness, and (c) that the "smectite" interlayers can be accounted for by the ability of such thin illite stacks, which have no three-dimensional register between the fundamental particles when sedimented onto glass slides, to adsorb ethylene glycol between the particles so leading to a false diagnosis of "smectite". This interpretation could have major consequences on the physicochemical properties of the shale, a matter that is examined more closely in the second part of this review.

    KW - Clay Mineralogy

    KW - Fundamental Particles

    KW - Illite

    KW - Permeability

    KW - Porosity

    KW - Shale

    KW - Unconventional Reservoirs

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964801132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964801132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.004

    M3 - Review article

    AN - SCOPUS:84964801132

    VL - 158

    SP - 31

    EP - 50

    JO - Earth-Science Reviews

    JF - Earth-Science Reviews

    SN - 0012-8252

    ER -