Applying Kramers formula for the nuclear fission problem

How accurate is it?

I. I. Gontchar, N. E. Aktaev, A. L. Litnevsky, E. G. Pavlova

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We compare results of dynamical modeling of the fission process with predictions of the Kramers formulas. For the case of large dissipation these are two: the integral rate RI and its approximation RO . As the ratio of the fission barrier height Bf to the temperature T, ε, reaches 4, any analytical rate is expected to agree with the dynamical quasistationary value RD within 2%. We perform modeling using several potentials and find that the difference between the RO and the RD sometimes exceeds 20% even for ε > 4. Such discrepancy is not acceptable nowadays because it is comparable to the quantum, non-markovian and multidimensional effects. The features of the potentials which cause this disagreement are identified and studied. It is demonstrated that this is the RI, not the RO, which meets the expectation above irrespectively of the potential profile.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number082023
    JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
    Volume312
    Issue numberSECTION 8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    nuclear fission
    fission
    dissipation
    causes
    profiles
    predictions
    approximation
    temperature

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physics and Astronomy(all)

    Cite this

    Applying Kramers formula for the nuclear fission problem : How accurate is it? / Gontchar, I. I.; Aktaev, N. E.; Litnevsky, A. L.; Pavlova, E. G.

    In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 312, No. SECTION 8, 082023, 2011.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Gontchar, I. I. ; Aktaev, N. E. ; Litnevsky, A. L. ; Pavlova, E. G. / Applying Kramers formula for the nuclear fission problem : How accurate is it?. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2011 ; Vol. 312, No. SECTION 8.
    @article{8c81a1f160b247028e85956a419bee6a,
    title = "Applying Kramers formula for the nuclear fission problem: How accurate is it?",
    abstract = "We compare results of dynamical modeling of the fission process with predictions of the Kramers formulas. For the case of large dissipation these are two: the integral rate RI and its approximation RO . As the ratio of the fission barrier height Bf to the temperature T, ε, reaches 4, any analytical rate is expected to agree with the dynamical quasistationary value RD within 2{\%}. We perform modeling using several potentials and find that the difference between the RO and the RD sometimes exceeds 20{\%} even for ε > 4. Such discrepancy is not acceptable nowadays because it is comparable to the quantum, non-markovian and multidimensional effects. The features of the potentials which cause this disagreement are identified and studied. It is demonstrated that this is the RI, not the RO, which meets the expectation above irrespectively of the potential profile.",
    author = "Gontchar, {I. I.} and Aktaev, {N. E.} and Litnevsky, {A. L.} and Pavlova, {E. G.}",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/312/8/082023",
    language = "English",
    volume = "312",
    journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",
    issn = "1742-6588",
    publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "SECTION 8",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Applying Kramers formula for the nuclear fission problem

    T2 - How accurate is it?

    AU - Gontchar, I. I.

    AU - Aktaev, N. E.

    AU - Litnevsky, A. L.

    AU - Pavlova, E. G.

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - We compare results of dynamical modeling of the fission process with predictions of the Kramers formulas. For the case of large dissipation these are two: the integral rate RI and its approximation RO . As the ratio of the fission barrier height Bf to the temperature T, ε, reaches 4, any analytical rate is expected to agree with the dynamical quasistationary value RD within 2%. We perform modeling using several potentials and find that the difference between the RO and the RD sometimes exceeds 20% even for ε > 4. Such discrepancy is not acceptable nowadays because it is comparable to the quantum, non-markovian and multidimensional effects. The features of the potentials which cause this disagreement are identified and studied. It is demonstrated that this is the RI, not the RO, which meets the expectation above irrespectively of the potential profile.

    AB - We compare results of dynamical modeling of the fission process with predictions of the Kramers formulas. For the case of large dissipation these are two: the integral rate RI and its approximation RO . As the ratio of the fission barrier height Bf to the temperature T, ε, reaches 4, any analytical rate is expected to agree with the dynamical quasistationary value RD within 2%. We perform modeling using several potentials and find that the difference between the RO and the RD sometimes exceeds 20% even for ε > 4. Such discrepancy is not acceptable nowadays because it is comparable to the quantum, non-markovian and multidimensional effects. The features of the potentials which cause this disagreement are identified and studied. It is demonstrated that this is the RI, not the RO, which meets the expectation above irrespectively of the potential profile.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80455127400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80455127400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/312/8/082023

    DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/312/8/082023

    M3 - Article

    VL - 312

    JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

    JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

    SN - 1742-6588

    IS - SECTION 8

    M1 - 082023

    ER -