Abstract
SWIPT techniques combined with wireless cooperative communication provides a sustainable solution to extend the lifetime of the communication networks. It prolongs the battery life of wireless low-powered devices and enables additional efficiency in terms of power in wireless communications. This paper explores performance difference of two simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) protocols named Time-Switching (TS) and Power-Splitting (PS). Two identical decode-and-forward relaying communication networks with multiple relays are considered, where energy constrained relay nodes harvest energy from the received Radio Frequency (RF) and use harvested energy to assist information transmission between the source and the destination. All relay nodes in one network use TS protocol while the relay nodes in the other network use PS protocol. In particular, we evaluate throughput and outage probability of maximal ratio combiner (MRC) output at the destination node of both systems. In order to evaluate throughput, outage probability is derived for delay-limited transmission mode. The numerical results provide practical insight into the performance difference in various system parameters for both TS and PS protocols. Simulation results obtained depict that the TS protocol is superior to PS protocol in performance parameters, BER, Outage probability and throughput in low transmission rate. However, in higher transmission rates PS becomes superior to TS protocol, though overall performance reduce compare to lower transmission rate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-151 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Physical Communication |
| Volume | 31 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- 5G communications
- RF energy harvesting
- RF wireless power transfer
- Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Cite this
Analysis of time-switching and power-splitting protocols in wireless-powered cooperative communication system. / Perera, Tharindu D.Ponnimbaduge; Jayakody, Dushantha Nalin K.
In: Physical Communication, Vol. 31, 01.12.2018, p. 141-151.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of time-switching and power-splitting protocols in wireless-powered cooperative communication system
AU - Perera, Tharindu D.Ponnimbaduge
AU - Jayakody, Dushantha Nalin K.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - SWIPT techniques combined with wireless cooperative communication provides a sustainable solution to extend the lifetime of the communication networks. It prolongs the battery life of wireless low-powered devices and enables additional efficiency in terms of power in wireless communications. This paper explores performance difference of two simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) protocols named Time-Switching (TS) and Power-Splitting (PS). Two identical decode-and-forward relaying communication networks with multiple relays are considered, where energy constrained relay nodes harvest energy from the received Radio Frequency (RF) and use harvested energy to assist information transmission between the source and the destination. All relay nodes in one network use TS protocol while the relay nodes in the other network use PS protocol. In particular, we evaluate throughput and outage probability of maximal ratio combiner (MRC) output at the destination node of both systems. In order to evaluate throughput, outage probability is derived for delay-limited transmission mode. The numerical results provide practical insight into the performance difference in various system parameters for both TS and PS protocols. Simulation results obtained depict that the TS protocol is superior to PS protocol in performance parameters, BER, Outage probability and throughput in low transmission rate. However, in higher transmission rates PS becomes superior to TS protocol, though overall performance reduce compare to lower transmission rate.
AB - SWIPT techniques combined with wireless cooperative communication provides a sustainable solution to extend the lifetime of the communication networks. It prolongs the battery life of wireless low-powered devices and enables additional efficiency in terms of power in wireless communications. This paper explores performance difference of two simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) protocols named Time-Switching (TS) and Power-Splitting (PS). Two identical decode-and-forward relaying communication networks with multiple relays are considered, where energy constrained relay nodes harvest energy from the received Radio Frequency (RF) and use harvested energy to assist information transmission between the source and the destination. All relay nodes in one network use TS protocol while the relay nodes in the other network use PS protocol. In particular, we evaluate throughput and outage probability of maximal ratio combiner (MRC) output at the destination node of both systems. In order to evaluate throughput, outage probability is derived for delay-limited transmission mode. The numerical results provide practical insight into the performance difference in various system parameters for both TS and PS protocols. Simulation results obtained depict that the TS protocol is superior to PS protocol in performance parameters, BER, Outage probability and throughput in low transmission rate. However, in higher transmission rates PS becomes superior to TS protocol, though overall performance reduce compare to lower transmission rate.
KW - 5G communications
KW - RF energy harvesting
KW - RF wireless power transfer
KW - Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056591006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056591006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.phycom.2018.09.007
DO - 10.1016/j.phycom.2018.09.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056591006
VL - 31
SP - 141
EP - 151
JO - Physical Communication
JF - Physical Communication
SN - 1874-4907
ER -