Aerial and Terrestrial Patterns

A Novel Approach to Analyzing Human Running

C. Gindre, T. Lussiana, K. Hebert-Losier, L. Mourot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biomechanical parameters are often analyzed independently, although running gait is a dynamic system wherein changes in one parameter are likely to affect another. Accordingly, the Volodalen® method provides a model for classifying running patterns into 2 categories, aerial and terrestrial, using a global subjective rating scoring system. We aimed to validate the Volodalen® method by verifying whether the aerial and terrestrial patterns, defined subjectively by a running coach, were associated with distinct objectively-measured biomechanical parameters. The running patterns of 91 individuals were assessed subjectively using the Volodalen® method by an expert running coach during a 10-min running warm-up. Biomechanical parameters were measured objectively using the OptojumpNext® during a 50-m run performed at 3.3, 4.2, and 5 m·s-1 and were compared between aerial- and terrestrial-classified subjects. Longer contact times and greater leg compression were observed in the terrestrial compared to the aerial runners. The aerial runners exhibited longer flight time, greater center of mass displacement, maximum vertical force and leg stiffness than the terrestrial ones. The subjective categorization of running patterns was associated with distinct objectively-quantified biomechanical parameters. Our results suggest that a subjective holistic assessment of running patterns provides insight into the biomechanics of running gaits of individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-29
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Running
Gait
Leg
Biomechanical Phenomena
Mentoring

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • coaching
  • subjective scale
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Aerial and Terrestrial Patterns : A Novel Approach to Analyzing Human Running. / Gindre, C.; Lussiana, T.; Hebert-Losier, K.; Mourot, L.

In: International Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 1, 28.10.2015, p. 25-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gindre, C. ; Lussiana, T. ; Hebert-Losier, K. ; Mourot, L. / Aerial and Terrestrial Patterns : A Novel Approach to Analyzing Human Running. In: International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 25-29.
@article{5fa07fa770824463816e64bb85f1832b,
title = "Aerial and Terrestrial Patterns: A Novel Approach to Analyzing Human Running",
abstract = "Biomechanical parameters are often analyzed independently, although running gait is a dynamic system wherein changes in one parameter are likely to affect another. Accordingly, the Volodalen{\circledR} method provides a model for classifying running patterns into 2 categories, aerial and terrestrial, using a global subjective rating scoring system. We aimed to validate the Volodalen{\circledR} method by verifying whether the aerial and terrestrial patterns, defined subjectively by a running coach, were associated with distinct objectively-measured biomechanical parameters. The running patterns of 91 individuals were assessed subjectively using the Volodalen{\circledR} method by an expert running coach during a 10-min running warm-up. Biomechanical parameters were measured objectively using the OptojumpNext{\circledR} during a 50-m run performed at 3.3, 4.2, and 5 m·s-1 and were compared between aerial- and terrestrial-classified subjects. Longer contact times and greater leg compression were observed in the terrestrial compared to the aerial runners. The aerial runners exhibited longer flight time, greater center of mass displacement, maximum vertical force and leg stiffness than the terrestrial ones. The subjective categorization of running patterns was associated with distinct objectively-quantified biomechanical parameters. Our results suggest that a subjective holistic assessment of running patterns provides insight into the biomechanics of running gaits of individuals.",
keywords = "biomechanics, coaching, subjective scale, training",
author = "C. Gindre and T. Lussiana and K. Hebert-Losier and L. Mourot",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1555931",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "25--29",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0172-4622",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aerial and Terrestrial Patterns

T2 - A Novel Approach to Analyzing Human Running

AU - Gindre, C.

AU - Lussiana, T.

AU - Hebert-Losier, K.

AU - Mourot, L.

PY - 2015/10/28

Y1 - 2015/10/28

N2 - Biomechanical parameters are often analyzed independently, although running gait is a dynamic system wherein changes in one parameter are likely to affect another. Accordingly, the Volodalen® method provides a model for classifying running patterns into 2 categories, aerial and terrestrial, using a global subjective rating scoring system. We aimed to validate the Volodalen® method by verifying whether the aerial and terrestrial patterns, defined subjectively by a running coach, were associated with distinct objectively-measured biomechanical parameters. The running patterns of 91 individuals were assessed subjectively using the Volodalen® method by an expert running coach during a 10-min running warm-up. Biomechanical parameters were measured objectively using the OptojumpNext® during a 50-m run performed at 3.3, 4.2, and 5 m·s-1 and were compared between aerial- and terrestrial-classified subjects. Longer contact times and greater leg compression were observed in the terrestrial compared to the aerial runners. The aerial runners exhibited longer flight time, greater center of mass displacement, maximum vertical force and leg stiffness than the terrestrial ones. The subjective categorization of running patterns was associated with distinct objectively-quantified biomechanical parameters. Our results suggest that a subjective holistic assessment of running patterns provides insight into the biomechanics of running gaits of individuals.

AB - Biomechanical parameters are often analyzed independently, although running gait is a dynamic system wherein changes in one parameter are likely to affect another. Accordingly, the Volodalen® method provides a model for classifying running patterns into 2 categories, aerial and terrestrial, using a global subjective rating scoring system. We aimed to validate the Volodalen® method by verifying whether the aerial and terrestrial patterns, defined subjectively by a running coach, were associated with distinct objectively-measured biomechanical parameters. The running patterns of 91 individuals were assessed subjectively using the Volodalen® method by an expert running coach during a 10-min running warm-up. Biomechanical parameters were measured objectively using the OptojumpNext® during a 50-m run performed at 3.3, 4.2, and 5 m·s-1 and were compared between aerial- and terrestrial-classified subjects. Longer contact times and greater leg compression were observed in the terrestrial compared to the aerial runners. The aerial runners exhibited longer flight time, greater center of mass displacement, maximum vertical force and leg stiffness than the terrestrial ones. The subjective categorization of running patterns was associated with distinct objectively-quantified biomechanical parameters. Our results suggest that a subjective holistic assessment of running patterns provides insight into the biomechanics of running gaits of individuals.

KW - biomechanics

KW - coaching

KW - subjective scale

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954397998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954397998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1555931

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1555931

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 25

EP - 29

JO - International Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - International Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0172-4622

IS - 1

ER -