Abstract
Comparison between analytical 1D and numerical 2D models is made to formulate recommendations on choosing temporal and spatial grid steps within numerical algorithms intended for solving thermal NDE problems. It is shown that accuracy in computing temperature is typically better than 10% in both sound and defect areas. Reference temperature evolutions are given for a few test situations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering |
| Publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
| Pages | 14-19 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Volume | 3700 |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
| Event | Proceedings of the 1999 Thermosense XXI - Orlando, FL, USA Duration: 6 Apr 1999 → 8 Apr 1999 |
Other
| Other | Proceedings of the 1999 Thermosense XXI |
|---|---|
| City | Orlando, FL, USA |
| Period | 6.4.99 → 8.4.99 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Condensed Matter Physics
Cite this
Accuracy of thermal NDE numerical simulation and reference signal evolutions. / Vavilov, Vladimir P.
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 3700 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 1999. p. 14-19.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Accuracy of thermal NDE numerical simulation and reference signal evolutions
AU - Vavilov, Vladimir P.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Comparison between analytical 1D and numerical 2D models is made to formulate recommendations on choosing temporal and spatial grid steps within numerical algorithms intended for solving thermal NDE problems. It is shown that accuracy in computing temperature is typically better than 10% in both sound and defect areas. Reference temperature evolutions are given for a few test situations.
AB - Comparison between analytical 1D and numerical 2D models is made to formulate recommendations on choosing temporal and spatial grid steps within numerical algorithms intended for solving thermal NDE problems. It is shown that accuracy in computing temperature is typically better than 10% in both sound and defect areas. Reference temperature evolutions are given for a few test situations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032652491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032652491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:0032652491
VL - 3700
SP - 14
EP - 19
BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
PB - Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
ER -