Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve

Correlation and accuracy

Konstantin V. Zavadovsky, Andrew V. Mochula, Alla A. Boshchenko, Alexander V. Vrublevsky, Andrew E. Baev, Alexander L. Krylov, Marina O. Gulya, Evgeny A. Nesterov, Riccardo Liga, Alessia Gimelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods: Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress − MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68%) vessels with a stenosis ≥ 70% and 9 (32%) with < 70% stenotic lesions. Results: The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35-2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P =.01), stress MBF (r = −0.46; P =.01) and FD (r = −0.37; P =.04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of ≤ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5%; specificity 93.3%), ≤ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 93.3%) and ≤ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 100%), respectively. Conclusions: The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Pathologic Constriction
Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
Coronary Angiography
Cardiologists

Keywords

  • Absolute myocardial blood flow
  • coronary flow reserve
  • CZT camera
  • fractional flow reserve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Zavadovsky, K. V., Mochula, A. V., Boshchenko, A. A., Vrublevsky, A. V., Baev, A. E., Krylov, A. L., ... Gimelli, A. (2019). Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z

Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve : Correlation and accuracy. / Zavadovsky, Konstantin V.; Mochula, Andrew V.; Boshchenko, Alla A.; Vrublevsky, Alexander V.; Baev, Andrew E.; Krylov, Alexander L.; Gulya, Marina O.; Nesterov, Evgeny A.; Liga, Riccardo; Gimelli, Alessia.

In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zavadovsky, Konstantin V. ; Mochula, Andrew V. ; Boshchenko, Alla A. ; Vrublevsky, Alexander V. ; Baev, Andrew E. ; Krylov, Alexander L. ; Gulya, Marina O. ; Nesterov, Evgeny A. ; Liga, Riccardo ; Gimelli, Alessia. / Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve : Correlation and accuracy. In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2019.
@article{c8bbd2c28aec465f93d4c6579e0b7ae8,
title = "Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy",
abstract = "Purpose: To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods: Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress − MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68{\%}) vessels with a stenosis ≥ 70{\%} and 9 (32{\%}) with < 70{\%} stenotic lesions. Results: The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35-2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P =.01), stress MBF (r = −0.46; P =.01) and FD (r = −0.37; P =.04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of ≤ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5{\%}; specificity 93.3{\%}), ≤ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2{\%}; specificity 93.3{\%}) and ≤ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2{\%}; specificity 100{\%}), respectively. Conclusions: The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD.",
keywords = "Absolute myocardial blood flow, coronary flow reserve, CZT camera, fractional flow reserve",
author = "Zavadovsky, {Konstantin V.} and Mochula, {Andrew V.} and Boshchenko, {Alla A.} and Vrublevsky, {Alexander V.} and Baev, {Andrew E.} and Krylov, {Alexander L.} and Gulya, {Marina O.} and Nesterov, {Evgeny A.} and Riccardo Liga and Alessia Gimelli",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",
issn = "1071-3581",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve

T2 - Correlation and accuracy

AU - Zavadovsky, Konstantin V.

AU - Mochula, Andrew V.

AU - Boshchenko, Alla A.

AU - Vrublevsky, Alexander V.

AU - Baev, Andrew E.

AU - Krylov, Alexander L.

AU - Gulya, Marina O.

AU - Nesterov, Evgeny A.

AU - Liga, Riccardo

AU - Gimelli, Alessia

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods: Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress − MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68%) vessels with a stenosis ≥ 70% and 9 (32%) with < 70% stenotic lesions. Results: The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35-2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P =.01), stress MBF (r = −0.46; P =.01) and FD (r = −0.37; P =.04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of ≤ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5%; specificity 93.3%), ≤ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 93.3%) and ≤ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 100%), respectively. Conclusions: The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD.

AB - Purpose: To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods: Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress − MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68%) vessels with a stenosis ≥ 70% and 9 (32%) with < 70% stenotic lesions. Results: The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35-2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P =.01), stress MBF (r = −0.46; P =.01) and FD (r = −0.37; P =.04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of ≤ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5%; specificity 93.3%), ≤ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 93.3%) and ≤ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 100%), respectively. Conclusions: The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD.

KW - Absolute myocardial blood flow

KW - coronary flow reserve

KW - CZT camera

KW - fractional flow reserve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062683132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062683132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z

DO - 10.1007/s12350-019-01678-z

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

SN - 1071-3581

ER -