Abstract
The nondestructive testing (NDT) of honeycomb sandwich structures has been the subject of several studies. Classical techniques such as ultrasound testing and x-rays are commonly used to inspect these structures. Holographic interferometry (HI) and infrared thermography (IT) have shown to be interesting alternatives. Holography has been successfully used to detect debonding between the skin and the honeycomb core on honeycomb panels under a controlled environment. Active thermography has proven to effectively identify the most common types of defects (water ingress, debonding, crushed core, surface impacts) normally present in aeronautical honeycomb parts while inspecting large surfaces in a fast manner. This is very attractive for both the inspection during the manufacturing process and for in situ regular NDT assessment. A comparative experimental investigation is discussed herein to evaluate the performance of HI and IT for the NDT on a honeycomb panel with fabricated defects. The main advantages and limitations of both techniques are enumerated and discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 012071 |
| Journal | Journal of Physics: Conference Series |
| Volume | 214 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
Cite this
A comparative investigation for the nondestructive testing of honeycomb structures by holographic interferometry and infrared thermography. / Sfarra, S.; Ibarra-Castanedo, C.; Avdelidis, P.; Genest, M.; Bouchagier, L.; Kourousis, D.; Tsimogiannis, A.; Anastassopoulous, A.; Bendada, A.; Maldague, X.; Ambrosini, D.; Paoletti, D.
In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 214, 012071, 2010.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative investigation for the nondestructive testing of honeycomb structures by holographic interferometry and infrared thermography
AU - Sfarra, S.
AU - Ibarra-Castanedo, C.
AU - Avdelidis, P.
AU - Genest, M.
AU - Bouchagier, L.
AU - Kourousis, D.
AU - Tsimogiannis, A.
AU - Anastassopoulous, A.
AU - Bendada, A.
AU - Maldague, X.
AU - Ambrosini, D.
AU - Paoletti, D.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The nondestructive testing (NDT) of honeycomb sandwich structures has been the subject of several studies. Classical techniques such as ultrasound testing and x-rays are commonly used to inspect these structures. Holographic interferometry (HI) and infrared thermography (IT) have shown to be interesting alternatives. Holography has been successfully used to detect debonding between the skin and the honeycomb core on honeycomb panels under a controlled environment. Active thermography has proven to effectively identify the most common types of defects (water ingress, debonding, crushed core, surface impacts) normally present in aeronautical honeycomb parts while inspecting large surfaces in a fast manner. This is very attractive for both the inspection during the manufacturing process and for in situ regular NDT assessment. A comparative experimental investigation is discussed herein to evaluate the performance of HI and IT for the NDT on a honeycomb panel with fabricated defects. The main advantages and limitations of both techniques are enumerated and discussed.
AB - The nondestructive testing (NDT) of honeycomb sandwich structures has been the subject of several studies. Classical techniques such as ultrasound testing and x-rays are commonly used to inspect these structures. Holographic interferometry (HI) and infrared thermography (IT) have shown to be interesting alternatives. Holography has been successfully used to detect debonding between the skin and the honeycomb core on honeycomb panels under a controlled environment. Active thermography has proven to effectively identify the most common types of defects (water ingress, debonding, crushed core, surface impacts) normally present in aeronautical honeycomb parts while inspecting large surfaces in a fast manner. This is very attractive for both the inspection during the manufacturing process and for in situ regular NDT assessment. A comparative experimental investigation is discussed herein to evaluate the performance of HI and IT for the NDT on a honeycomb panel with fabricated defects. The main advantages and limitations of both techniques are enumerated and discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950792713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950792713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/214/1/012071
DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/214/1/012071
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77950792713
VL - 214
JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
SN - 1742-6588
M1 - 012071
ER -